Nah. Believe it or not, the vast majority of us liberals evaluate each situation independently. While I’d need more information to make a final judgment, my strong initial inclination is that the officer was removing her in one of the few ways that was really available to him (since she decided to go dead weight, it…

I speak from experience when I say that it’s infuriating to not get an overhead bin space and be forced to check your bag, (especially when you brought a little duffel and the bins are full of bags that exceed the size limits...)

I totally agree with you, but I’ve found that it’s getting a little more variable now that they seem to be using bomb-sniffing dogs a lot more - the past 4-5 times I flew (all in the past month), I only had to take my shoes off once, they used the metal detector only and didn’t require laptops or liquid bags out of…

Definitely not acid - LSD has many different possible effects and they can vary hugely from person to person and experience to experience, but suddenly going limp while being an entitled asshole isn’t among them.

Uhh... it changed.

Why is Wisconsin’s current record relevant to the job status of Indiana’s football coach?

American’s. Amazing.

Seems like you know a thing or two about idiotic opinions.

Total guess, but I’m gonna say that as opposed to Trump simply making it up, it could be a hoax. I can see Trump being incredibly gullible.

That was my first takeaway as well... someone report that man for soliciting child pornography immediately!

You’ve used a lot of words and statistics to respond to a joke, so maybe Adderall?

I disagree with your actual last sentence.

Spare us, please.

I love how badly that backfired on her.

With all the sports to choose from he’s got some tough competition, but I think he’s certainly in the running. I know he annoys some people but I just don’t get it - I love the varied vocabulary, especially since he always seems to find the perfect descriptor for the play. And I love how excited he gets - if I’ve had…

Very mature of you to ban me, when I haven't used abusive language or been abusive in any way, and clearly had the same read as most of your audience. But sure, go ahead.

You're trying to backtrack, but your words can be found in the article above. You wrote:

You're being extremely disingenuous and I think you know that. You're essentially saying "I'm not explicitly saying he's a bad guy, but let me tell you all these things that are really bad that he does that make him a bad guy. But I'm not saying he's a bad guy, I swear! Also, he could do all these crazy and…

I don’t understand your argument at all anymore - in your reply to my other thread you explicitly advocated the stand on principle / blaze of glory that you’re now claiming not to advocate for. So which is it?

There’s nothing admirable about going out in a blaze of glory, or taking a stand on principle, when the results of that will be entirely negative for the people you’re trying to help. It’s naive and foolish, not admirable.