? No. If an adult is having sex, that is included in their sex life, regardless of what their motivation for having sex is.

Sexual activity is sexual activity, even when it’s compensated. That’s why, if someone rapes a prostitute, it’s still rape, not “theft of services.”

Hey, the Enquirer ruined John Edwards. Remember?

It went on for SO LONG

Who is this guy? WTF.

What an asshole. Clearly he doesn’t know how to channel his rage through dance

They’re both very flawed. Team Darryl & White Josh 4 Lyfe!

.

Is that the same room as the family portrait with the stuffed lion? because wow, all of the proportions are wrong. The ceiling is way too low for that broke-baroque crap. Those columns look like his fingers — short and girthy.

“Trump’s just an idiot with no sense of aesthetics”

From my vast experience (Nearly my entire immediate and extended family is rabidly republican and I live in a heavily republican area), a lot of people who think Trump is a piece of shit but find it completely impossible to vote for a Clinton are clinging to the excuse of Supreme Court nominees as a reason to go ahead…

Secondly, I now know who Billy Bush is.
This also bothers me.

I want my last Thursday’s brain back.

I can’t believe that Billy Bush lost his job as an entertainment reporter over these comments, but over 40% of the country still wants Trump to be PRESIDENT.

Guys. Guys? Guys.

Alternately, be awful at your obsession with blood testing and maybe one day you can be a junior phlebotomist at a Labcorp office or the local county STD testing center.

Forbes changed her estimated net worth from $4.5 billion to “nothing.”

Yeah, I wish the post and made some sort of effort to introduce them. This seems like the sort of thing I would know about but I’ve never heard of them either.

I mean, other than the “brains deposited on her face” you just described Lady Bird Johnson, Eleanor Roosevelt, Mamie Eisenhower, Martha Jefferson, and Hillary Rodham Clinton.

I think the writer of this piece has over-estimated the general interest in the Mitford sisters. I’d say they’re still known in a fairly limited circle of society. I know of them and found them interesting in a general “oh that crazy time between the great wars” kind of way. It wasn’t called the Lost Generation for…

I’ve never heard of them before either. I admit, I didn’t read the whole article, so I clearly missed a lot. But in the few paragraphs that I did read, I did not get the intrigue of these sisters.

Saying there’s a new book about the Mitford sisters is a bit like sharing the breaking news that the sun rose again.