Americans. Are you suggesting "Nigger, please" is not a popular expression?
Americans. Are you suggesting "Nigger, please" is not a popular expression?
Yes.
What’s wrong with the statement that it’s okay to be white? How is that wrong?
Anger? I’m incredulous at your credulity.
Oh, now I’m a Russain? Hahahahha. You just got dealt a deathblow to your conspiracy theory yet you keep going. Fabulous.
That expression has nothing to do with race, it is the quintessential expression of exasperated incredulity in the modern vernacular. You fag.
It's a direct quote from the report saying there was no conspiracy. Is it your contention that the report DOES find conspiracy, in light of this quote?
You keep saying Junior met up with Russians to get dirt but forget that he DID NOT ACCEPT SAID DIRT. And yes, the investigation was FOCUSED on collusion. You fucking fool.
Oh no, I said a naughty word. It's a common expression. The left used to defend free expression, but You think that's white supremacist. Unreal.
From Vice, no brackets:
Oh my Christ. Now you're just making shit up. Did the report find evidence of collusion, based on this quote?
I guarantee you won't accept the findings of the full report. Youv E already made up your mind. Unreal. You think findings of no illegal activities implies that there might be evidence of illegal activities. Jesus wept.
Who was indicted for attempting to conspire to steal the election, again? Oh right, nobody.
How, precisely, am I a white supremacist? Don't you ever get tired of labelling people this when you get hacked into a corner?
There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity,” Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said at a press conference on Friday.’
We absolutely do know what Rosenstein said, I quoted him and linked to the source earlier in the thread. He said that based on the report, no American was found to have engaged in any illegal activity. Do you still think the Trump administration conspired with Russia to change the outcome of the 2016 election?
Collusion in this case specifically means conspiring with Russia to steal the election, and you know it. How, precisely, is no AMERICAN being indicted for any illegal activity NOT proof of no collusion, as found by the report?
No, it wasn’t limited, but no CONSPIRACY was found. Again, refer to Rosenstein saying that based on the report, no American was found guilty of anything illegal, *at the close of the investigation*. Do you believe this? Because it would um, strongly imply nothing in the report says differently.
Um. Okay. My entire point is that there are no indictments at the end of the investigation and you people still believe in collusion. So my question is relevant. Yes or No?