How? Prove that he is racist. The onus is on you.

Evidence of his racism. Please. It's your claim, the onus is on you to prove it. He's just against illegal immigration. Are you? And how does that make him racist?

Then where is it? Where's the evidence he's a white nationalist?

Quote him them. If it's your contention that's he's racist, the onus is on you. He's just against illegal immigration. Do you support illegal immigration?

Prove he is. It's your contention, onus is on you.

How? How is his racism and white nationalism apparent? He's just against illegal immigration. Do you support illegal immigration?

Why is it that when I questioned I had to justify my positions but when you’re questioned its just “I don’t need to justify anything ?”

Answer my question: How could a marginalized person like you prosper in a patriarchal system? That would mean either that the conspiracy theory of patriarchy is just that of that if it exists it has failed and is therefore irrelevant. Why didn’t the system oppress you, stop you? Why would it give you opportunities?…

I’m making some assumptions about your politics. I know I shouldnt, but I think it’s safe because of your other positions, even if you don’t justify some of your positions.

“I worked hard for the life I live.”

I simply want you to justify child transitioning and the no-such-thing as biology positions because I wonder how anyone could possibly justify these beliefs/practices. I explained all my positions to you, I’m wondering how anyone can justify these things. But you do you.

There is institutional racism against whites in hiring/acceptance into the work place/academia.

Again, a cop out. You don’t want to spell out your positions on biology and child transitioning because you know they will sound indefensible. And I haven’t moved any goalposts, I’ve answered every damn thing put to me.

“I’m sorry to tell you that trans people will continue to exist. “ I was replying to this. You’re implying that I don’t want you to/believe you exist or that me not using your pronouns is tantamount to not validating your personhood. That’s a common tactic in weaponized victimhood, to say a disagreement is a threat…

You would be an outlier. And you know it.

No, I would break the law and use nigger whenever it was appropriate and in context, i.e., during the course of shit talking and in our relationship.

You are the problem he is talking about and you can't even sense it.

You are insufferable.

Holy shit, that sounds phenomenal.

So since we don’t have unlimited free speech we should diminish it further? We have agreed upon limitations to avoid violence. That’s all. We aren’t going to limit it anymore because of a group of activists with pressing mental issues want to. If Canada wants to, fine. We’re not doing it and when it comes time to…