Everybody cared about Henry VIII’s boner. His boner created the Church of England.
Everybody cared about Henry VIII’s boner. His boner created the Church of England.
Geralt is a classic manly man who’s good at everything except long term relationships with women. Not everyone finds that particularly interesting or appealing.
Well, and Dio, that one is pretty obvious. Also, once the Pillar Men awake: Santana, AC/DC, Cars, Wham! Plus every Stand is named after a band or song.
Or, if you look at it this way, a whole bunch of people who had no idea that Roundabout existed and who knew only vaguely about Yes have had a chance to discover that song and come to appreciate how fantastic it is. Rather than languish on classic rock stations (or worse - oldies stations), it’s now got 15 million…
do.... you need a tissue? :|
I must be the only person who hates the Witcher. I find no appeal to it. I also find it boring with the whole “I’m super gruff and have lots of sex!”. I don’t really want to play as that. That and the gameplay felt crappy to me. Maybe I’m just to use to games like Skyrim and Fallout.
The Challenger and Skyrim ones were the best to me, and that’s totally not because I missed almost every other joke there... yeah...definitely.
When I think of the countless military families moved at the government’s whim multiple times, my sympathy for them runs a little low. And the fact that HE DOESN’T PAY TAXES SO THIS IS ALL ON US makes me a tiny bit ragey.
I don’t understand what you’re implying. Like I said, it’s bizarre that anyone would go out of their way to note that a parent is close to their child. Parents are supposed to be close to their children.
“...Melania is extremely close to Baron,” the source told the Post, “and they have become closer during the campaign...”
Let’s be real: Melania has been keeping away from Donald’s white hose for a while now.
Follow-ups: how much is this going to cost us as taxpayers? And how much is this going to cost Midtown businesses?
I think a lot of people were looking to reassure themselves that Trump COULDN’T POSSIBLY win. A lot of those people now feel betrayed the tools they used to comfort themselves in a stressful time. It is, strictly speaking, anti-intellectualism, but I think simple raw emotion and disappointment have more to do with…
It’s also absurdly ignorant. Sam Wang isn’t just “some guy.” He was the first guy in this business, he accurately predicted 2004, he was the closest to bullseye in 2008. He missed one state in 2012 but called the popular vote as well as the 10 competitive Senate seats.
Gregpalast.com isn’t evidence. Might as well be unskewedpolls.com
Actually, Nate Silver gave Trump a 33% chance of winning. Which means, of course, that if you throw a 3 sided die three times, Trump wins on one of the tosses. Those were still incredible odds for Trump.
Wang, HuffPo, and others definitely deserve criticism for bad modelling. But Wang admits he fucked up and has promised to try and do better in the future, so I just think it is dumb for the author of this article to suggest he find a new profession.
The thing is, whether he is mentally ill or not, mental illness is never an excuse for what a person is doing, it merely provides a reason. When someone with a mental illness does something that falls in line with that mental illness it doesn’t make the thing that happened okay, erasing the problem with a “Well... you…
the fuck kind of coffee are you drinking