First I’ve heard of it.
First I’ve heard of it.
disregard. wrong person.
Too much car for too little a driver
I just realized I have no idea where you would get your Tesla serviced if you owned one.
I have a Syma X5C drone and it is a fantastic ‘starter’ drone. It’s good a reasonable range and is damn near indestructible (though I recommend a pair of tweezers to pull out small twigs that can occasionally get stuck in exposed ‘gears’).
I have a Syma X5C drone and it is a fantastic ‘starter’ drone. It’s good a reasonable range and is damn near…
Thanks for correcting me!
Why do you feel that way?
I appreciate you posting the source, but I’m not sure I take the following quote the same way you do. It seems pretty ambiguous and open to interpretation, but I do agree that (with a little more clarity) she could definitely have been saying that currently level 2 is safer than level 4 or 5.
I hope that was the case. Perhaps I’m reading to much into one author’s opinion or wording.
How is the source code an important piece of history?
It’s not unreasonable to expect them to pay return shipping.
Man returns presumably stolen property and is selfish?
What do electric city buses have to do with the Hyperloop? The Hyperloop is to get from city to city, not around one of said cities.
Is it?
A freak accident driving into a building and people at 40mph? Also sounds like the driver opted to hit people instead of a parked car.
Holy hell are those cars ugly.
I don’t think I worded my question well; I was more referring to why not bring the probes back, but I didn’t consider that the tech would be decades old and that it would likely be cheaper to send a new, better one than actually return antiquated equipment.
Possibly a dumb question, but why incinerate the probe instead of bringing it back to Earth?
I was 8 in ‘93, so I don’t remember a whole lot of particulars from vehicles I didn’t see with some frequency.
This is hands down my favourite vintage of Porsche and I always loved that the RSR was naturally aspirated.