Which is worse, glamourisation or radical feminism’s debasement of the entire sex industry? I would say the latter is more dangerous as it is more pervasive, ignores (or deliberately silences) the voices of sex workers themselves, promotes counter-productive and harmful policies and is a useful money making exercise…

The candy coating is having it be a streetwalker rather than an escort. The ‘sex work is hell’ brigade use cherry picked statistics from studies of streetwalkers to generalise about the whole the sex industry. Having her be a higher class call girl would have been far more believable but the film works emotionally…

You can consent when you are drunk. If you can be held legally responsible for driving while drunk or hitting someone while drunk you can also be held responsible for kissing someone when drunk. 

The film is a wonderful satire of very comfortable, upper middle class girls (and women) who like to imagine they live in an oppressive patriarchy.

Yes, Daphne comes out with a lot of unlikely Americanisms. 

On the contrary, Joe Jnr is one of the best things about the film.

Any Judd Apatow film is worse. 

Whiny, hysterical, self important SJWs can’t take it when they’re the butt of the joke. What else would you expect at Jezebel? 

Yes, if you assault someone you get punished.

No, I mean seduce. If you cannot tell the difference between emotional manipulation and seduction that is your problem.

You honestly believe 7 billion men hate women as a group to some greater or lesser degree?

What a silly article. The term ‘bad feminist’ doesn’t belong to Gay or black feminists in general. It simply means not good. Atwood was using it ironically and defending the principle of a fair trial and innocence until proven guilty which is an improvement on the feminist witch-hunt Clarkisha recommends (with racist…

To all those are mocking his looks, would you respond as well if one of your darlings, a feminist like Lindy West, for instance, was mocked for her weight? I don’t care about the rights and wrongs of this man and Google but I do recognise a bunch of hypocrites on this appalling site who like to give their bullying the…

“Christopher Hitchens (the darling of many sexist idiots) once argued that ‘Free speech shouldn’t just guarantee your right to speak your mind, but that you must be listened to and given a platform to speak from.’ (Paraphrasing).”

It isn’t just governments which can censor people. If you don’t believe me draw a picture of Muhammad and publish it online with your real name as the artist.

Jezebel celebrates real pigs being murdered by psycho bitches.

Yes, anti-French xenophobia is definitely the way to go. Most of them are white and Christian so it won’t matter. Just make sure you make it clear you don’t mean the brown and Muslim ones.

Bardot might be a touch racist but she cares about animals, whereas Jezebel publishes articles about pyscho bitches who like to murder pigs. And Allen might be guilty, or he may not, but he didn’t publish an article about how funny it is to beat up men. Jezebel did.

Yes, definitive proof. Let’s lynch the fucker. Who needs evidence, a judge, jury or trial when we’ve got the pitchfork feminists of Jezebel?

Yes, you crazed pitchfork carrying nitwit. Alleged, not proven. So he’s innocent until convicted by a jury. So if we want to live in a world in which people’s lives are ruined based on mere allegations then he should get to live in peace and work without being hounded by cretins like you, no how guilty you believe him…