evilcock
EvilCock
evilcock

Whether the term was cooked up by the Clinton campaign and promoted by journalists, or cooked up by journalists and promoted by the Clinton campaign, there is no doubt Clinton used it to her advantage.

Not every country in Europe is part of NATO.

Well I didn’t vote for Bernie Sanders (though I much prefer him to Clinton), so no. In fact, the major reason I didn’t support Bernie was because of his support for the types of actions you mention. In any case, one can make an argument the aumf was justified. Voting for the Iraq War simply was not.

Where did it come from if it wasn’t from the Clinton campaign? The pundits overwhelming supported Hillary so it shouldn’t be a surprise they picked up the term so quickly.

Source? Russia isn’t part of NATO.

You obviously can’t feel too badly about the hundreds of thousands who died if you’re such a strong Clinton supporter.

It seems like it’s much more likely that Clinton will provoke a war with Russia than Trump.

Regardless of what the initial post of this thread is about, I find it disturbing that you appear more upset about Sanders criticism of the electoral process and that he didn’t sufficiently attacking the handful of crazy supporters, than the fact that Clinton voted for a war crime.

I’ve already addressed your first point.

I have found a party that represents my views and I vote for and support them. That party is not the Democrats or Republicans.

Because most Democrats are too afraid of Republicans to criticize Democrats.

You are correct - the Dems position on banks does not mean much in this debate.

Every candidate has crazies supporting them. Even Hillary. But here we are, talking about how widespread Bernie Bros are and not discussing policy.

Haha. I corrected you and you deleted the response. You’re despicable!

Stop projecting. I care about social and economic issues. You evidently only care about social issues.

Do you think her supporters in the media miraculously came up with the same term at the same time?

“Bernie Bro”

It’s not that it should have been uncontested, it’s that anyone who could ever possibly run against her, or even criticize her, is automatically sexist.

Unable to come up with a response, huh?

How rampant was misogyny among Sanders supporters? It existed, sure, but you also have to admit it was something the Clinton campaign used to shield themselves from legitimate criticisms.