The question is what would be the point?
It takes the enemy two seconds to realize its been nuked and either retaliate or turn the world against you. A new doomsday weapon is just an empty threat compared to cold war.
The question is what would be the point?
It takes the enemy two seconds to realize its been nuked and either retaliate or turn the world against you. A new doomsday weapon is just an empty threat compared to cold war.
So I’m not clear on this 700mpg thing...
I was expecting this at the top of the thread.
It’s the ultimate “why did nobody make this?” bike.
Americans like the freedom of choice, which is why guns are legal and why cars will have the human driven option for the foreseeable future.
We can, Altho it’s annoyingly limited by enlikes of the ATF.
The fact that Americans own ar’s is a testament to ingenuity in itself. We’ve managed to advance the design of bullpups, computer machined parts, and optics in our civilian market. Much of it just to get around the restrictions
I like this...
Yes, but a gun from a ship has a range and time limitation. Unless the target is another ship that bullet still needs a minute to reach far inshore.
It’s not the same as a plane that can loiter, spot a target, and drop a bomb or do a strafing run seconds later.
Planes can be reused tho. It’s like saying a gun isn’t cheap compared to hand grenades, forgetting that bullets themselves are inexpensive.
I think the problem with carriers and our air fleet in general is that we’ve over engineered our weaponry for the conflicts that we actually have.
We are making the mistake that…
The problem is that accurate weaponry costs money and most of our low tech enemies know we can’t sustain a high tech war against them.
You need that low cost option of cheap air support and cheaper ordnance.
I know its purely jet porn, but a part of me always hoped someone would have picked up the F-15 active.
Right now I’m just hoping that Israel’s interest makes the Airforce look at its end goals again. Because going with the Silent Eagle seems far more budget friendly for a large fleet than trying to complete the F-35A
That’s the core of the problem.
A man needs help escaping from a flood and you give him two anchors...
I wonder... I mean, this is the kind of WOW factor that sells cars.
That’s some Star Citizen tier shit right there.
I need that in my life...
The US has missiles too, which is why sending a larger assembly of ships cuts to the chase.
Not every commando, militia, or PMC is a terrorist. Some combatants have official sanction from respected authorities, others don’t. But most tend to hole within certain moral guidelines.
Terrorism is the use of violence in pursuit of political goals.
The game is called modern war, and I took it in the context that terrorism was a part of modern war.