Improve sustainability and yield? Yet in EU yields and drought-resistance capabilies of conventional crops have either matched or exceeded their transgenic couterparts in Canada and the USA.

That’s incorrect, not all corn is transgenic. The debate over GMOs refers to transgenic crops.

Funny, I looked it up and there are zero long-term, independently peer-reviewed, controlled feeding studies in any mammallian species that would support the idea that giving 7 week olds formula with GE ingredients is safe.

No, “generally accepted” is a dog whistle for morons who think they’ve rebutted anything by confusing cross-breeding and selective-breeding with transgenic.

Please go ahead and cite all the studies you’ve looked up and we’ll see how scientifically valid they are as long-tem, independently peer-reviewed, double-blind, controlled feeding studies in any mammallian species.

Fallacies for the win! It’s clear than in 99.99999% of discussions “GMO” refers to transgenic crops, which we’ve been doing for around 30 years not 30 ooo years. Not once has any long-term feeding study compared overall health outcomes over the course of at least 50% of a lifetime in any mammallian species that would…

It hasn’t save a single life, what a load of BS.

I believe the point he was making was wholly fallacious.

Conventional, because you enjoy increasing your risk of pesticide exposure and antibiotic-resistant bacteria by 30% (September 4, 2012 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine (Smith-­‐Spangler et al.,Vol. 157, Number 5: pages 349–369) [the Stanford study]

It’s odd you’d point out how the EWG list is misleading without pointing out that the statement “organic food has pesticides too” is also, given that I don’t know any informed consumer that would ever make the blanket statement “organic food has no pesticides”. Organic food contains no synthetic pesticides, the…