esquire27
Esquire27
esquire27

It doesn’t matter in this instance, because the meaning of your utterance, “Don’t serve onions to persons not here”, is clear.

I understand singular they without understanding the circumstances surrounding the specified individual. Therefore it is not the case that no one understands singular they without understanding the circumstances surrounding the specific individual.

German does not equal West Germanic languages.

I love you thank you

What. It’s not your choice to regulate what pronouns other people prefer.

Grammar is bullshit not recognized by linguists other than in the sense that “People use these forms and we should describe it like good scientists but it doesn’t mean they are right or wrong”

Nope. English is a West Germanic language and not a Greek one. 30% of its vocabulary is borrowed from Romance languages, sure, but its syntax is very Germanic.

Okay friendo, whatever your conception of language rules is is probably wrong. Sure, there’s general usage descriptions, such as the Cooperative Principle, which describes a principle that speakers in a conversation follow a lot of the time and seems to be helpful, and the maxims that go with it. But the thing is that

macOS Sierra still is on HFS+, not AFS. macOS High Sierra will change to AFS

Buddy, you just might have anxiety

My dating anniversary is the same as my parent’s anniversary and I’m going to push getting married on that day too. Why have three dates to remember when you can have one?

It’s when you introduce yourself, not start a conversation

Maybe they’re NAS drives? Idk.

Top line is the municipality issued and a vehicle code, and the next line is a hiragana character plus four digits. The color and hiragana depend on the vehicle type

Fucker, his expectation was to receive the services of a woman. He did.

Nah asshole, we were done when you got caught up on the pedantics of prison versus jail

Because the sentence isn’t necessarily nonviolent in of itself. A lot of people, me included, view incarceration as inherently violent regardless of what actually happens during the incarceration because it’s a state restriction of the human body. (Foucault, not that I agree with him on a lot of things, writes a lot

A. It’s not “free”, considering the option of increased imprisonment

Yes, and prison/jail/confinement/whatever a pedant wants to call it is still a state apparatus of force.

Jail. Prison. Whatever. It’s a very trivial difference. Still state use of force. A person is still under a non-free decision environment.