In the previous five years of torrenting I've had TOPS a half dozen files that have given me grief. And I'm not some expert file hunter either, my computer skills are fairly low.

Now there's a movie that gets no love.

I'd say we're outliers (but I haven't worked with too many other scientists in a normal setting). I think she'd fit right in with us though.

I had a lady friend who made me watch the whole series and that's a jarring relationship. It seems like it could have worked but the writers didn't know what to do with it once they started it and let it fall by the wayside.

My group (geology) is a little 'incestuous' as it were so it's tough to say. Industry wide I'd say we're in the norm… but we bunk in the same rooms together, eat together, work together, and hang out together in the evenings… and on top of that we all hang out together outside of work because the scheduling is so…

All the time. I work with scientists that do long rotations away from civilization and there's a shocking amount of foul language (I'm probably the worst offender).

Wouldn't having two groups of guests wandering around on opposite ends of a plot line that involves running around the park at night with hatchets and Bowie knives almost totally invite disaster? That's a good way to get killed imho.

I would say the latest grab ass he's accused of dwarfs any of the earlier stuff but that might just be me.

"The price of change is Donald and the cost of avoiding Donald is Hillary."

I almost wonder if it wasn't Michael, but his colleagues. Since we now know that they seem to think he's insane for living with his humans maybe they sabotaged his efforts.

I think you mean since Becker.

Maybe boring from a strategic perspective, but being down in the trenches I suspect you were rarely bored what with the constant sniper fire, trench raids and occasional artillery barrages. There was a reason they went to a 2:2:2 schedule (two weeks in the front, two in the reserves, and two in the rear), guys were…

I think the bigger issue (for me at any rate), is that while rape is bad, it doesn't make the film bad…

Louis Riel was definitely not crazy… but he defied the Catholic church and made his own system, and to them THAT was crazy, Why would you change the teachings of the church if you weren't crazy?

No mention of Tahani complaining about her hair BARELY cascading down her shoulders? That was the best line of the night.

There's three hundred people, so there's bound to be a few there, we just haven't seen them yet.

If you read the wikipedia article about the disaster, there's so much blame to go around that the bottom feeders must have at least been tacitly aware that what they were doing wasn't totally up to best operating practices.

Can you envision a world where America helped Russia after the fall of communism rather than spending ten years rubbing Russia's nose in it?

If you're reading about a fairly obscure topic you'll often be lucky to find half a dozen books on it, so then it becomes a guessing game as to which book with the generic publisher cover and zero reviews is the most useful. This is non-fiction mind you.

True Grit is quite a bit more murky about which is better. I'd argue that the Coen brothers version is the best western of this century, and top five of ever, but the original has a wore out Duke falling off his horse (something utterly beyond comprehension for its day).