ericogiall
EricoGiall
ericogiall

Fungus,

I stand corrected.

Yes. You know what his crime actually is? Protesters don’t even know why they’re mad. He’s not a racist. He’s not a white supremacist. Not a fascist. Not a Nazi.

A) Are you familiar with the events at Evergreen U this year? Students and faculty wanted white people to leave campus for an event. One professor refused. The students went berserk.

Fine, use whatever term you want. The people who build the automated infrastructure would have power. Google has power, and are deeply progressive, but far from benevolent.

Ah yes, I must read pol. How else to explain my willingness to accept people I totally disagree with?

No. PP’s abortion practices are only 3% of their services, but they receive 500 mil of federal dollars, but the mostly provide Medicare services and Title X family planning.

My ex is from Uruguay. Voted Trump. Couldn’t talk her out of it. She’s “patriotic”. What would you have me do? Cut her out of my life? She’s had her struggles.

I know! So random! ROTLBTFO YOLO LOLO #PWNED #getridofelectoralcollege #picklerick #nihilism jibber jabber nothing of value zippity doo dah #narcissism

My god, I was insulting you by calling automation robots.

Wrong, no, wrong, Katie, wrong and cynical. People cannot choose whom they fall in love with and to eliminate someone immediately based on their present political stance—even about this—is narrow and short sighted and shallow and frankly, anti-love. Because maybe, Katie, a leftist could even fall in love with (gasp!)

Okay, fair enough. Again, let’s say we have enough resources to feed/house everyone at an above sustenance level. Maybe that is true. Lets act as if it is.

I will look at these more closely, but I skimmed them. Let’s say for the sake of argument that luxury communism will sweep the globe (forget the unfolding population and political crises in

Alright, first of all: Telling someone they cannot grasp the clarity of your ideas is usually a sign that communication of said ideas has failed. Or is a rhetorical tic to dismiss or undermine the other speaker.

He’s not gay. He’s married with kids.

I know welfare has been racially motivated. You are saying that instead of pushing for reform, the BEST way to deal with this is to overthrow capitalism and strive for robotic proletariat utopian communism and therefore not try to reform policies within our current situation as this is counterproductive to the end

They don’t care? Extremely simplistic. The people who do RICO and undercover are serious, serious people. Are they all white supremacists? Some? Yes. Enough for them not to do the work they are committed to?

Okay, but I’m going to throw this out there: When people on welfare get married or even cohabitate, they immediately lose assistance. In these cases, it would be harder to get married and have both partners work than to not get married. I think this perpetuates intergenerational poverty and single parent households,

Yes, he is wrong. He thinks it is a cultural issue in these communities. What if I suggested that there is a reason for these problems that also affects white communities that isn’t systematic supremacy?

How so? I’ve heard him talk about black poverty and crime stemming from single parent homes. Does that make him a WS? How?