entropyjukebox
Entropyjukebox
entropyjukebox

Easy. Those women don’t exist. You’re welcome!

Here’s the really fun part. It’d actually be the marriages our mothers/grandmothers endured for a while before bailing on them. All this “young people aren’t getting married!” hysteria is replacing “everyone is getting divorced!” hysteria because young people are wisely delaying commitment (or avoiding it) after

In what some (the author) likely consider a groundbreaking assertion, University of Texas sociology professor Mark Regnerus is warning women that no one buys the cow when it gives the milk away for free.

a 24-year-old guy named Kevin, a man of age who knows all there is to know about romantic and sexual relationships:

So, if I take charge of my sex life and demand respect, creepy assholes will turn to porn instead? I fail to see the problem with that.

Honestly, I’m waiting for the essay from Peter Thiel about how women getting the vote is the worse thing that ever happened to democracy. Something has expressed in the past. As have a lot of right wing misogynists.

Ah. That explains it.

I’ll never understand how people who make these arguments miss the main, glaring fallacy in their logic: the assumption that the only possible reason for romantic relationships and marriage is sex. Under that assumption, this all makes sense. Who needs a relationship when you can get sex without one?

But that’s some

Yea, not to brag, but I provide a pretty good life for myself as a single gal. I bring in a decent income, have a vehicle I like, I can rent a nice apartment, I have my own Netflix account, I can buy myself stacks and stacks of books to read in peace and quiet, and I never have to clean up after someone who isn’t me

Now playing

I am very much in favor of more women raising their standards and exercising discretion, like Ron’s ex (??)-gf here:

Online porn has made sexual experience more widely and easily available too. A laptop never says no, and for many men, virtual women are now genuine competition for real partners.

The major reasons to get married before the sexual revolution was basically 1) getting the hell out of your parents house 2) having some level independence/adulthood 3) having sex 4) (for women) having someone who can financially provide for you and (for men) having someone who can help run your household, make

Get rid of the chin pubes doc and maybe you’ll have better luck.

What if a woman doesn’t want to get married but does want sex? (But not with Kevin) What then Dr Regnerus?

Better to fuck Kevin than marry him. But preferably neither. That said, his whole premise is based on the antiquated notion that women only have sex to try and get married, while men try and have sex but avoid marriage.

In a society where most people are getting sex when they want it fairly easily there’s no incentive for men to appease women who hold out unless they’re emotionally connected enough to wait for that specific person. This dude doesn’t really want to believe that men can get that connected, so essentially he’s saying

I think the sexual revolution might have contributed to the declining marriage rate, but not in the way this guy thinks. If you’re young and horny, but believe in waiting until marriage, you’re probably going to get married young to the first reasonably attractive person who comes along. But if you can bang that

Wait, why is the Wall Street Journal publishing this garbage? There will always be misogynists. That doesn’t mean that a main stream publication has to give them a platform. I’m more pissed off at the Wall Street Journal for enabling this garbage. What’s next? An essay on white supremacy to follow this essay on male

Hmmm.... I wonder if having the ability to be financially independent and less stigma about having premarital sex has led women to not feel like they have to get married right away?
But no, it of course its because women are cheap.