Ngl, I thought we'd already bid farewell to him and wasn't aware he was getting even more screentime.

My personal headcanon was that Giovanni is Ash’s father and that’s why no one talks about his dad.

Get this: he decides to quote himself over a point he already lost and replies with bolded text and cussing now, and completely dropped the goalpost thing after getting shut down. This is hilarious.

Pfffft ha ha ha, what a loser. I really hope you get the help you desperately need, especially if you’re declaring victory over a 1% usage rate for Steam. Majority of an ant is still an ant, so I hope declaring yourself the winner makes you feel like less of a waste of oxygen. God knows you seem to need the ego boost~!

Seems you don’t bother to read either, since I included the total VR usage on Steam in the opening paragraph on my post. Here, I’ll quote myself:

Yeah, the filter list authors likely updated.

He was just mad that someone bothered to point out how insignificant his numbers were, so he started planting new goalposts all over the place to defend his precious luxury niche product.

Buddy... YOU brought up the 41% figure for Steam, not me. I responded to your goalposts, so your whole wall of text wasn't worth reading.

To this day, I have never, not once, met a person who called it "Meta" unless they worked for the press or in the industry. The absolute closest I've heard was "the company that makes Facebook".

Oh yeah, 41% of 2.12% of Steam’s userbase is really impressive. Shall I break that down for you?

Eh, I don’t mind well-done pixel art, and in the case of TMNT:SR, it was trying to recapture the arcade games specifically, which had a signature aesthetic. Continuing your existing aesthetic makes sense.

I've found that generally happens with adblockers on, particularly on Gizmodo for me.

Bad arguments that diminish the value of your precious game:

Facebook has never been consistent with Facebook's policies, what else is new?

Which is why they totally didn’t settle on a case that clearly would have been dismissed again because it obviously would have been dismissed again. Oh, and they totally didn’t admit to having no determinative evidence of cheating despite standing by their original accusa—excuse me, report.

To say nothing of these horrible CRT "filters" in collections of old games. I get by with custom soft scanline filters, but most CRT filters look terrible.

Ever heard of nostalgia? I hear it makes good money. Or, to put it in words you can understand, nostalgia for pixel art makes pixel art games “sale” well, and those sales will plummet once the generation that grew up with them is gone.

They exist on settlements because the companies in question don't want the bad optics and are willing to pay to get the plaintiff to go away. If you're admitting you were wrong publicly in a settlement, you ain't doing so because you have "strong evidence", you're doing it because you agreed to say it. And you only…

“Marcus Carlsen and Chess.com admit to no wrongdoing” being missing from the conclusion of a defamation lawsuit (which, let’s be clear, are notoriously difficult to win) kind of leaves a massive hole in your theory.

Yeah sorry, but unless you’re willing to let yourself be judged for any mistake or cheating in a given game, this argument doesn’t have a leg to stand on.