Bad arguments that diminish the value of your precious game:

Facebook has never been consistent with Facebook's policies, what else is new?

Which is why they totally didn’t settle on a case that clearly would have been dismissed again because it obviously would have been dismissed again. Oh, and they totally didn’t admit to having no determinative evidence of cheating despite standing by their original accusa—excuse me, report.

To say nothing of these horrible CRT "filters" in collections of old games. I get by with custom soft scanline filters, but most CRT filters look terrible.

Ever heard of nostalgia? I hear it makes good money. Or, to put it in words you can understand, nostalgia for pixel art makes pixel art games “sale” well, and those sales will plummet once the generation that grew up with them is gone.

They exist on settlements because the companies in question don't want the bad optics and are willing to pay to get the plaintiff to go away. If you're admitting you were wrong publicly in a settlement, you ain't doing so because you have "strong evidence", you're doing it because you agreed to say it. And you only…

“Marcus Carlsen and Chess.com admit to no wrongdoing” being missing from the conclusion of a defamation lawsuit (which, let’s be clear, are notoriously difficult to win) kind of leaves a massive hole in your theory.

Yeah sorry, but unless you’re willing to let yourself be judged for any mistake or cheating in a given game, this argument doesn’t have a leg to stand on.

I pray that the game ends up being everything (or at least something) the fans wanted, but it’s also Bethesda, so I’m not holding my breath that it’ll be successful for any reason beyond that it’s a Bethesda game.

I’ve been playing games since the NES in 1987 (first title ever was Rad Racer, ha ha) so I grew up with nothing but 2D pixel graphics... and frankly? There’s a few standouts, but in most cases they WERE ugly as hell, and it’s annoying seeing so many games that try to capitalize on nostalgia for them to make a quick…

That’s a fault of the format rather than a problem with the game itself (most MMO-lites run into this problem).

Ahhhh, okay. Thanks for the clarification.

Not sure what you’re trying to say, son.

Light cantrip. Put it on your party leader. Instant ten minutes of protection, can be cast infinitely. Damage ramp-up resets as soon as you enter a lit area, i.e. around your party leader, so outside of combat you’ll basically never proc the damage. I figured that out my first playthrough, it wasn’t exactly rocket…

Because that’s exactly what it is, they’re literally just splitting up the content differently. There are some minor differences like apparently being able to do the content in anachronic orders, but let’s face it, barely anyone’s going to do that because they’re going to do the new content as soon as it drops.

Is it cheating? By technical definition, yes. Do I care? Absolutely not. Have I ever gotten caught? Nope, because I know how to make things legit and aren’t lazy with editors.

Woof. Can I have some of the hallucinogenics you’re clearly imbibing?

I’m sorry that you’re so butthurt that you somehow took my post as me saying that I test better instead of simply being that I like confirming for myself since I can actually control my own tests and thus know the process that led to the result.

Which, of course, is no distinction. It was exchanged for money, and thus it was sold; auctioning is just the medium through which the sale was performed, it doesn’t make it any less of a sale.

Apparently fireupabove and everybody playing Follow the Leader? A commentor snarking about articles they don’t have to read is several levels of magnitude less important than a news site posting news regardless of your personal level of care, lol