Out of curiosity, what do you define as “finished” in a game with procedurally-generated content like NMS?
Out of curiosity, what do you define as “finished” in a game with procedurally-generated content like NMS?
“So it is absolutely not a 200 or 300 hour epic unfinishable RPG.”
Sadly, it seems to be a low-effort remaster according to reviews I’ve seen. You’ve probably done so already, but if you want tactical mechs, I’d recommend Battletech.
Because I like keeping up on gaming news and being part of discussions. Just because you’re not invested in the contents of a trainwreck doesn’t mean you don’t stop and stare, or mention it at the dinner table.
It already was. They remastered the first game recently.
Trying too hard~.
The result of a caustic culture of yes men kissing the asses of the incompetent yet grossly over-estimated, no doubt. Frankly, I’m all but certain it’s higher end managers who got their egos inflated by the successes of those under them that make these unilateral decisions, and the devs are so used to being run over ro…
Poor baby doesn’t understand that broken can also mean horribly unbalanced. Anyone reading, please pray for him.
As someone who is blatantly uninterested and therefore uninvested in Blizzard’s library, it’s a trend I keep noticing that borders on conspiracy; release game in a broken, OP state to get their fans invested and news sites talking about broken builds, then pull the rug out to make it “balanced” after everyone’s…
“We’ll never do this kind of patch again,” says dev studio after the thousandth patch of said type drops. "We'll be more open with our process," the studio added in a similarly-numbered promise it expected to be forgotten in a week.
That's more the problem with the whole venture capital system in general, where you can lose money hand over fist as long as you can convince some mark to give you millions on the premise of maybe becoming profitable in the future, then having no ans for doing so until thelast minute.
I’m pretty sure the “some shit” is about Valve playing both sides by contacting both Nintendo and the devs about it and telling the devs to negotiate with a company that infamously doesn’t do that.
Investigate them for... what, exactly? It's not against the law to decide to take your business elsewhere, and antagonizing them for doing so is the sort of "woke behavior" you apparently detest on top of these worthless investigations being charged to taxpayers...
Yeah, definitely going to stop watching YouTube entirely and just download my favorite playlists for ambient noise while I sleep.
Fuck. My rogue is going to have to pants every guard in the city again, isn’t he?
Funny thing is, it IS canon. Descent into Avernus, an official Wizards of the Coast 5E adventure module, features a dragonborn with a tail, and it’s a direct prequel to BG3. It’s noted that Dragonborn with tails are exceptionally rare, but it’s canon that they do exist now.
I don’t see why that can’t just use what they use now, just in a removable form factor.
Because then they wouldn't be able to charge repair fees.
Trying too hard~.
Trying too hard~.