Spooky! On the bright side, life is meaningless and we are already dead.

I formed this exact comment in my head two seconds before reading yours. Peace be the journey.

I feel like this is the third or fourth behind-the-scenes look at masks or dolls being made and each one was billed as “creepy” or “disturbing” and they were neither, nor were they interesting.

Great point, and I suspect the prosecutors more or less wanted this result.

Why would this make you think Trump will get elected?   This farce was carried out by a small group of dipshits from rural Oregon. Trump will lose. All these fuckers will lose. They are not representative of the US citizenry.

This is a travesty.  

Were your parents the first generation in your family to come to America? I would think that growing up in a country with a caste system might influence a person’s views on race.

It was a bad start regardless. Thursday night games are never the time to take a flyer on anyone.

You claimed that any person voting for Trump is ipso facto supporting bigotry because Trump has expressed bigoted views. I’m pointing out the absurdity of this logic. Trump is an idiot and an asshole but labeling any person that votes for him a bigot is just silly and dillutes the word to the point of…

That’s why high-quality plaintiff’s attorneys took the accuser’s case. Because Derrick Rose is rich. Plaintiff’s attorneys work on contingency in cases like this. That means their client pays nothing if they lose, but they get a portion of the judgment (usually 40%) if they win. So you see, the best plaintiffs…

Superpredators

Just maybe not as clever as you think.

$40k student debt is worse. He will never pay a dime of the $115M judgment. The student debt can ever be discharged.

The “slant” is in the titles the author has used for many of the Rose trial blog posts. And you have no idea whether there was any bias in the selection of testimony, argument, and statements/rulings by the judge summarized in these blog posts unless you have read the transcripts from each day of trial.

Really weird takeaway. I can’t imagine anyone blaming the dog when the owner sics the dog in their presence. Like, what would that even look like?

He’s for sure pudgy and for sure has had very limited interaction with women in the physical world.

The judge was instructing the jury that the testimony is relevant only to the element of damages, and not other elements or issues of credibility that the jury will decide.

This comment has the ring of truth.

Please tell me whether you feel the publication of each of the following is journalism or gossip-mongering: (1) Peter Thiel’s sexual orientation; (2) a stolen videotape of consensual sex between Hulk Hogan and a non-celebrity woman; (3) details regarding the divorce of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt.

What if you had Peter Thiel’s clout? Would you sue to get Gawker off your dick?