“because I do” is not a convincing argument. Got anything better?

quite a trick for those retarded millennials to have traveled back in time to make the show popular back in the late 80's/early 90's!!

lololol, apparently my opinion has not changed.

No.

Came here to post this, awesome.

Is that green 2002 actually a ti?

Exhilarating

great

Another word for you to look up and ponder: semantics.

I’m not trying to save face. Why would I NEED TO????? All I tried to do was give you some writing advice so you could communicate your ideas more easily and clearly. You, in turn: misinterpreted and misunderstood my advice, and for some reason, decided to attack me for giving it.

The whole point of a headline is to generate interest. EVERYThing anyone has ever posted on a page supported by advertising revenue is click bait on some level.

A fact cannot be untrue

Chips looks so bad! I’m hoping it’ll be good, but idk about the choice to make the 2 main characters into bumbling idiots. In the original, they were competent cops.

Yep, e36 oil filter is in the same spot.

I think you’re missing the idea that people spout a lot of bullshit and call it ‘facts’. People can absolutely be wrong, and what is presented as a fact can abSOLUTELY be refuted.

my point was that you used refute incorrectly. ‘ignore’ would probably be better in that sentence to get your point across. Using ‘refute’ there makes the sentence say the arguments will be correct and prove you wrong . . . and it seemed like you wanted to say the opposite— that the arguments will IGNORE facts.

I’m not the one using it incorrectly, tho. You really want to keep digging this hole?

you should quit replying because eventually they just refute facts

heh, white supremacy= petty differences. suuuuuuuuuuuure, buddy!!

sure, but it’s still good! and if we don’t include WI, it’ll be GONE.