He has no reason to acquiesce to a former employer if he’s in the legal and personal right.

Seeing your repetitive posts on every Destiny article is usually annoying, but today, I agree with you. 

Get what you’re saying, but I can’t ignore it just because Fortnite has already jumped the shark while banging an octopus. It may not bring a narrative structure that has been bastardized by the introduction of so many IPs but it sure makes the practice look good. Other studios are tripping over their own dicks to get…

I didn’t mention Fortnite because (to me at least) its long been a brand playground that I don’t even think about as having a distinct universe anymore. (I know it has lore, but even that is intermingled with BRANDS)

I didn’t spend money on Aloy’s armor set, and I love the Horizon franchise. There’s no way in the Traveler’s green earth I’m gonna spend money on this.

Pretty much. Fortnite is the biggest offender, but you didn’t mention it for some reason? The thought of shooting at a cartoon Banana while cosplaying as Alan Wake seems so discordant. Or Chun-Li sniping Ellen Ripley? It’s obnoxious and diminishes the original properties. Shoehorning in the cameos into MK11 actively…

Surely this will get players back? Or, I guess, make them go play Witcher 3 for the fifth time. 

This is genuinely pathetic. The Part One remaster was barely justifiable so soon after the release of the PS4 remaster, but at least that was actually updating it for a new platform. Part Two is already one of the best looking games on the PS5; asking people to pay another $70 (because you fucking know it’s not gonna…

A series with 2 entries and 3 remasters

While common sense would dictate CEOs be treated like any other employee, most companies enter into a contract with their CEO. The golden parachute is often include as a way for the company to part ways early with said CEO. So to dismiss without said compensation would most likely lead to a very lengthy legal battle.

Can someone explain to me how Sega is able to decide whether it is or is not for sale, yet Twitter was “forced” to sell itself to some dumb fuck with no actual plan to finance the sale because of fiduciary duty and obligation to the shareholders and whatever the fuck else. I know Twitter was publicly traded at the…

Wise words, and a wiser choice.

Unlike Gotham Knights, this is a direct sequel to Arkham Knight, which I’m sure you’re aware of. The problems come in when you take that fact into account, and consider this game as existing within the Arkhamverse.

I find it incredibly morbid that in his final role as Batman you’re tasked with killing him in a soulless live service money pit.

I think they brought up Origins because it wasn’t Conroy in that one. Joker and Batman were voiced by different people. Both of whom did great, to be honest. 

If you’re coming out with a live-service game at this point you’re basically showing up for the California Gold Rush in 1855. You just sold everything you had and moved across the country for nothing.

It’s starting to feel like live service game monetization is becoming something of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Trying to build a game around a live service design ends up taking so much more time and development resources that they literally need the live service tail to even turn a profit. But they could’ve released…

Maybe? But I feel like they set themselves up for it. Microsoft literally described Starfield as one of the most important RPGs ever made, and then it barely even made the list of nominees. I think if they’re going to oversell it like that it’s fair to call them out.

So this was all your doing!? You subjected us all to this most terrible of fates all just for your own devastation!? You sick, beautiful, unicorn-loving bastard! I hope you sleep well at night, but not too well! (ง ͡ ❛ ︹ ͡❛)ง