elpaco13
elpaco13
elpaco13

In regards to #1: I understand they are related and that FA is kind of a sub of Jalopnik. People DO comprehend that. However, they are actually deciding to x-post this on Jalopnik. But more to the point of another comment; there are better areas for this type of article: Fusion, The Root, etc.

Trump’s temperament is wholly unsuited for the office.

What didn’t I say?!

FA has been morphed from a cool place to ... a political sounding board

This whole thing is like jacking off into a fan for Democrats: It may be temporarily super satisfying, but it’s turning into a real fucking mess.

These are great at 6-corner intersections (where 3 roads cross), because the intersection itself is so large. I do it here in Chicago because the opposing car has almost twice as far to go before reaching the middle of the intersection.

I watched this, and then read the article... then the subsequent addendums that included new movies. It’s quite a hole to tumble down and I enjoyed it.

*Cars is mentioned*

Model-S
Model-3
Model-X
Model-Y

If only there was a TV show that had done some sort of rugged South American trip already for us to learn from.

We’ll see where they end up in the Constructor’s Championship at the end of this F1 season.. then I’ll think about getting this.

I know this isn’t “modern”, but this always blew my mind:

Can’t wait to see what pics that photog snapped.

I saw one of these around Edinburgh when I was there... then a few days later I was at the Bond in Motion exhibit in London.

This Lotus is my absolute favorite of his that he drove during his tenure... even more than Wet Nellie or the Citron.

Thanks to the “math” of photography never really changing (ISO, shutter speed, and aperture), I was able to capture these shots from a Porsche weekend at Road America a few years ago on film.

Can I start a IndieGoKickMe page to buy Matchbox versions to mockingly send all these Kickstarter pages?

Maybe I read it too fast, but do we know what plane they are putting these on? I’d have to assume a 777?