So what you’re saying is that there are no longer standards for winning a Pulitzer?

If there were any such clause they wouldn’t have been attempting to bribe people with money to give up their ticket.

I’m not buying this shit.

I am not watching this trash. And yes even though I have not seen it I am certain that it is trash. Goddamn Kartrashians can’t do a goddamn decent thing that would require them to step to the side and stay the fuck away from a camera.

So the entertainment/propaganda venue which makes its living demonizing Black people is racist even off air?

He traveled to New York because it’s the media capital of the world. He wanted to make sure his anti-Black message got out.

Who the fuck cares about his arrest record, which has literally nothing to do with his murder?

There goes that pesky media again; treating Black victims worse than white perpetrators.

Which is exactly what is being described.

No it is not a stretch. He deliberately left his own town and state and came to New York because it’s a media center because he wanted to make sure what he did got out. He targeted someone specifically because they’re black and chose a place in order to increase the number of eyeballs who saw the story. He either…

I didn’t actually say that. In fact I made a point of saying that it was possible (although this painting sure as hell isn’t an example of that) and that I didn’t think this particular artist was capable of that.

Leave me the fuck alone. What part of that are you too stupid to understand?

Why the fuck are you still talking to me?

I don’t give a fuck about the white supremacist. I find it suspect when suddenly people are talking about how we’re supposed to be cheering when the white supremacist system moves to protect a white man while the plight of others is ignored. There are more pressing assaults, ones that are done deliberately and you’re…

Given the rarity of the ability to cause one with a gif, it’s not something that people should reasonably expect to have to look out for.

Yes I do. What’s your point?

I’m not calling for paintings to be destroyed so I don’t know why you keep talking as though I’m Ms. Black.

I’m merely pushing against your assertion that there was no logical why someone shouldn’t explore the subject matter. I think the fact that she seems incapable of actually exploring the subject matter because she’s far more involved in herself than the actual subject matter is a logical reason. Apparently your…

Any painting of anything must treat the subject as an object. Paints don’t animate, they don’t speak or sing or dance.