Miss me with the excuses. Bigots have always feigned being decent. They are not.

Exactly! What the fuck kind of bullshir is that. The bitch is kind to you doesn’t change the ugly hatefulness of what she is and did. White people are so quick to talk about how nice some bigot is. No, they are not nice; they are just nice to you.

What does that have to do with anything? This isn’t about where Trump is from it’s about his mindset which might as well be southern. We’re talking about remaining a part ofa government that consistently takes money from our states passes it on to states that are openly hostile to us and our residents and consistently…

Why only California?. I say the entire northeast break off from the rest of the country as well. Why not? Like California, we pay more in taxes to Washington DC than we get back from it yet we’re constantly brought down by shitty politicians in southern states who are net takers who make things worse for the rest of…

OMG That’s an exact quote?

I had a shitty boss like this once.

Not a surprise that it’s a common tactic. White perceptions are more important than actual reality.

Are we suprised? Orange Foolius is a moron he parrots whatever the last person who talked to him says. It’s not at all a surprise this also applies to his television watching.

You spelled “mock” wrong.

You assume that I’m not in the catagory of vulnerable people for whom this party does very little. The Democratic party has been playing games with civil rights in order to push neo-liberal policies. The Democratic party does very little for Black people as a group and we’re a damn consistent voting bloc especially…

That should be number 1.

The costs to cover law enforcement is called taxes this bit of legislation is merely an attempt to circumvent the first amendment.

Wasn’t that the point of this law in the first place? To suppress free speech?

Oh are we pretending that Democrats haven’t put up problematic appointees? Really? You’re still not giving people a reason to vote for someone just a reason to vote against another. That would be the shit campaign I was talking about. It’s not very effective in turning out voters in many areas hence the bloody loss in…

Fuck. Thanks for that. I’ll just dismiss.

First of all I didn’t say it was the candidate’s job to get people to vote; it is however, the canddiate’s job to get people to vote FOR THEM. Clearly, something Clinton did a shit job at what with her not even turning up in certain states despite people from those states telling her that thigns were not going the way…

You mean like setting oneself on fire?

You’re putting the blame on the wrong people. It is the job of the candiate to get people to vote for them not the job of the voter to vote for someone regardless of how odious they find the candidate.

Why wouldn’t they?

What you mean is that protests are fine so long as they are so out of the way as to make them easily ignored by you. In other words; protests are fine so long as they’re ineffective.