“But she’s hot! You don’t cheat on hot people!” - paraphrasing the last word salad about this 

The cruelty is the point.

So to be clear, you are saying that when she says “even a 10 second trending TikTok video can do damage”, you don’t think she’s talking about Siwa’s 10-second video that trended on TikTok, and the damage she perceives it did to her, meaning Bure?

She’s clearly referring to the video Siwa made and the “damage” it did to Bure’s rep, not the impact the original interaction had on Siwa.

You are weird.

You can’t ignore the violence that was perpetrated on women by men in that time. It shouldn’t be downplayed and it shouldn’t be glorified.

It’s a show that has flying dragons that breathe fire. But, sure, I guess you need to stay true to “that time.”

100% wrong. Medically it is absolutely considered a pregnancy. If my patient has had an ectopic pregnancy, and I was asked if my patient had ever been pregnant before, the ONLY correct medical answer would be YES. Being even more pedantic, the shorthand docs use is “G” (For gravida-i.e. pregnancies) and “P” (for…

Ectopic pregnancy is a pregnancy, no sarcastic quotations needed. That ZEF will latch on and continue to replicate and expand on any hospitable tissue or environment— it does not discriminate, nor is it cognizant that it is the spawn of an unviable pregnancy.

This is some lazy, hack-y shit. Saying “inexplicably” somehow ignores all the established psychological understanding of infidelity and how it works. Do better. For fuck’s sake. 

Bums me out that we still think this way: that it would be crazy for a guy to cheat on a supermodel, which implies what? That less attractive women should expect to be cheated on?

Is this a joke? This is such a cliché article. The same article that is written anytime a famously beautiful woman is cheated on. People assume someone’s level of physical attractiveness should make their partners incapable of cheating on them. What does that say about less attractive people? Of course, she was…

I know I’m not the only one who’s hoped that someday Chris Evans and I would bump into each other.

The way the Constitution set up for you to advance that position is convince your fellow citizens, that if you succeeded in convincing your fellow citizens, then your state would change the laws to reflect those views. In Obergefell, the court said, “No, we know better than you guys do, and now every state must, must…

I wonder what these people are devising. I really want to know the specifics.

Why the heck can god make a billion zillion galaxies in a day out of nothing, but to make a woman he needs to cheat and take a shortcut and use Adam’s rib? I’m beginning to think the whole account is a bit sus.

Yup. Never mind that God is also the world’s leading abortion provider (ending something like 20% of all pregnancies).

I still struggle with the logic where you have an option to save one life or lose both and you choose lose both.

How do they not understand that if the person carries the pregnancy dies ...so does the fetus??? So instead of the loss of one (potential) life, they are losing an actual life AND the potential life they want to save? Monsters. 

The Texas complaint states “On the contrary, EMTALA contemplates that an emergency medical condition is one that threatens the life of the unborn child. It is obvious that abortion does not preserve the life or health of an unborn child.”