Don't get me wrong here, I'm not blaming the dev's entirely for this massive failure at all. But to characterize it as a somewhat black boxed project or them flying blind would be somewhat of a stretch. They knew what they were getting into, and probably understood the concerns of the general public far before it was…

I have gotten out of every non-competor I have ever been issued and later granted (three, to this date). When you're in a highly specialized field and in a high demand skill set, there are clauses that exempt. As other comments have noted, the always on DRM did not happen overnight two weeks ago.

No, the easy answer is that the best need to work for the best. That just isn't the case. Enron needed some fantastic accountants, but not every fantastic accountant needed to work at Enron. You find something you feel in unethical or against your ethos, find a better place to roost.

Then those developers need to realize, given their possible talents, that they need to take them elsewhere. Granted, EA probably can pay more competitively, but if their paychecks are in fact tied to this they'll walk elsewhere. And that's how it should be. But if they continue to stick on board and weather the storm…

5VDV253

Shout out to Alpharetta

I'm slow nodding at my desk in approval. +1, sir.

So did I. My thoughts wen't from "heh...idiots..." to "oh my god! No! Idiots!"

After more thought, this has to be a troll. There's no way anyone is this fucking idiotic and sheepish and I bit. Dammit.

Lot of Amway tards here, huh?

Haha no, friend. I'm one of those people playing God.

...exactly! Science!

The trick is to fire into the ground, bouncing the tank right back up. Physics. Duh.

Ha. Whatever helps you sleep at night, champ.

And amen to that.

Interesting - thanks for the actual picture of it. I'd been wondering what the stubs actually said.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating the practice at all, just food for thought. I'm thinking Saturday's situation in congruence to situations like what occurs when signing affidavits for sky diving or rock blasting that limits liability from a vested interest's standpoint. There ultimately is a clear inherent…

That's somewhat my point. They have invested in safety previously to encourage ticket sales and alleviate spectator fear. This provides some assumption that they are taking safety seriously. So when their mantra on safety is "no way, you bought the ticket" how much of that is plausible granted their previous record? 

NASCAR's response does bring an interesting take though. Just like at baseball games where they come across the screen saying "watch out for flying balls and bats," they are able to distance themselves by safety due to the spectator experience. I believe there was a precedent of this set by a fan at a soccer game who…