Most of the good stuff has been allowed to end.  

It’s not quite the same as a typical recasting. The recasting of Rhodey still fit into the continuity and timeline. Fury Road and Furiosa can’t take place in the same timeline as the first few movies. There’s even incongruities within those two movies as the Max says in Fury Road he was once a cop but he’s in his 40's…

with the benefit of hindsight it gets funnier and funnier that joaquin phoenix’s job in ‘her’ is writing personalized greeting cards.

don’t forget hulk also has a kid.

One theory I heard sometime ago, and I’m sorry if Jenny has already touched on this, is that the Disney Star Wars experience tries too hard to live between the original trilogy, which is what the tech bro’s would likely want, and the Force Awakens, which is an appeal to the would be children of those tech bros.

Star…

I’ve also heard that they’ve scaled back on the castmembers interacting with the guests at their “Galaxy’s Edge” Star Wars lands for likely the same reason. When it opened, the idea was it was all in character with the castmembers “really” being stormtroopers, Jedi, and so on.

I do think that maybe it’s gonna go something like this: Star Wars is vastly more influential on a narrative level but TPM may ultimately be more influential on an aesthetic level. (Though I think Ahch-To in The Last Jedi is an awesome sequel-era planet.)

Yep. That is exactly what happened. The two reporters even gloated over his gaffe.

Chris Farley has to think about his entire life before he acts in a movie opposite David Spade!

Has Larry (at least the “Larry” he plays on Curb) ever been repentant?

Rick and Michonne’s incredible knack for survival despite his terrible decisions that get everyone else killed over a seriously long period of time

Rick began “The Walking Dead” saga looking for his family; he ends it with... A completely different family.

Me being the history nerd, always kinda wished they leaned more into history. The Titanic briefly shows up in 2 and I think that’s awesome.

If Stone’s performance weren’t one for the ages I’d agree, but it really, really is one of the best performance’s of the year.  Gladstone’s performance was, too, and honestly I don’t think there’s a good argument for either of them not winning, unless it was to the other.

I’d like to introduce Emma to survivors of the Bataan Death March and the Rape of Nanking. Perhaps we could dig up some Japanese WWll war atrocity films of Japanese soldiers pointing a gun at the head of a father, and demanding that he rape his daughter for their amusement. Japan was not a westernized, consumer…

This. AV bleeding heart writers seems forgetting history read. Japan never innocent in WW2, they were even worse than Nazi German in a lot of ways. Nuke those two cities is akin to choose the lesser of two evils. Either land invasion that resulted in worse situation, millions of Japanese + thousands of US forces gonna…

Oppenheimer took on a similarly shameful moment in American history but didn’t actually show it on screen.

Oh fuck all the way off twice. Emma Stone did nothing wrong.

“Robbing” is a strong and inappropriate word. It would have been awesome to see Gladstone win because I really loved her performance, but Stone’s was also really incredible, and a much bigger part of her film. The award was up for grabs especially between the two of them, and not for Gladstone to lose.

Who would have thought someone who specifies they use “he/she/they” pronouns would be a high maintenance pain in the ass?