@Silent: I can respect having a forum or a game where "anything goes" as long as everyone knows the rules going in and and understands that property rights do not exist and will not be protected. I get that.

@-MasterDex-: Sure. Here ya go:

I knew it was fake from the moment she claimed he spends five hours a week on TechCrunch. Not even TC's writers read TC that much.

There's no upgrade possible that would make me upgrade my version to lose MJ and his 'Thriller' attack.

For every article I read about the controversies involving EVE, I can't help but think that the game is poorly designed and when exploited they throw their hands up and say "fuck it".

I cant help but wonder how the conversation escalated that she wanted to attack the employees. As a fellow nugget lover, I can understand being denied them, but to the point of attacking?

I'm continually amazed at the DK record being broken. I thought that it had been a while since the record holders had exhausted the maximum number of points possible? If that's the case, how do they keep beating it?

@virtualfaqs: "Some say I'm being cocky. Some say I'm being lazy. I say, I'm being Billy Mitchell."

@Panzercat: In retrospect, your post could have been the ENTIRE article above, and we would have benefited more from it.

@Matt0505: Here, here. Well said. They can't have it both ways. In the case of the Apple scandal, Giz freely tossed around the defense of "we're a news outlet, legitimate journalists, blah blah" but in cases like these they'll shield themselves with "we're just a tech blog and you DON'T have to read us." Gizmodo has…

@rock99rock: I think we're saying the same thing with different words. =D

@grindking: More misleading than incorrect. Yes, a Google/VZ deal is news, but it is not affecting net neutrality.

@ikaiyoo: Yes, good sir. You are correct. I'm glad most of the community is interpreting the news stories correctly and are not shouting that the end of the world is nigh.

@cyberXwarrior: WITHOUT staring a Glenn Beck debate (I don't personally care), he's good at what he does — giving his audience what they want to hear. In the case of net neutrality, he'll suit the story to his audience's interest, so it may not be the whole story, but enough for his followers to believe it. =/

@n9n3: It also didn't help that the NYT had it wrong from the jump and Giz followed it along w/o any research.

@Dapke36: They're doing a disservice to the readership that will glance at the article and spread the news to their friends in phrases such as "Giz sed it, teh Goooogle iz bad!"

@David Insley: Sensationalism. They grab our attn with the crazy headlines to have us push through more page counts and more ad money. Seems they value that more than well-thought and researched news.

@parabellum2000: Just b/c everyone else jumps off the bridge doesn't mean you should too.

@rock99rock: It's becoming unnerving. They push the story TWICE w/o fact-checking or following up, and choose only to add correct information later. Legitimate news outlets do research FIRST and then publish.

Noooooooooooo. No no no no no.