I did say help to, for a reason. Obviously more need to happen, can anyone argue that reducing crime is a bad thing?
I did say help to, for a reason. Obviously more need to happen, can anyone argue that reducing crime is a bad thing?
Honest question here, and truly id appreciate a genuine, educated, and non inflammatory response:
Come on man, I think I made it pretty clear I wasn’t trying to shut down any discussions, I was simply asking a question. Obviously, I’m ignorant in this regard, and I genuinely want to know this. The media doesn’t cover this stuff much, but I don’t see Black Lives Matter marches when a kid get killed by some black…
I believe white cops killing black folks is obviously a HUGE problem in this country, but something I don’t understand is why people just wave away and scoff at the topic of black on black crime. I mean ... black lives matter right?
They both dress so classy.
Church is not the right place for this. I wish people would leave their business outside of the church.
Not doubting your story because I know Deaf and hard of hearing folks who are rabid Trump supporters, but there are a lot of ASL signs and classifiers that can look similar to a Nazi salute if the signer is only using one hand or is being more casual or if a viewer doesn’t have the full context of the communication.…
Are you simply a troll who crawled out of a grey hole somewhere? Because it appears that someone else was idiotic enough to ungrey your pedantic, and moronic drivel you little twat.
My wife has two degrees from UC Berkley, including a Women’s Studies minor and thought this article was a huge reach and actually chuckled a few times as I read it aloud to her (confession: I may have dramatized my reading a bit). I guess I should tell her that she has no critical thinking skills now?
This entire article is some kind of sarcastic write-up, isn’t it?
It is a...painfffullly difficult reach.
Thank you. I was sitting here wondering if I was an asshole the entire time I was reading the post.
Is life even worth living without manufactured outrage?
So I pulled up PT’s rate card. 62.8% of their readership is female. Maybe, just MAYBE since about 2/3rds of their readership is female, they use females on the cover?
If everything is offensive, nothing really is.
1. Yes, the photos used in a story are usually less dramatic and smaller than the cover photo. That’s how things work.
I agree with the other currently-pending-folk. Respectfully, I think you’re over-reacting.
Oy vey. Sorry, I can’t get it up for this one.
I think your grasping at straws here