earlrebound
EarlRebound
earlrebound

Exactly.  This is what makes no sense.  Especially considering that Domino’s is a public company.  I can’t believe that shareholders and a BOD would allow this case to escalate.  Not only does it make more financial sense to just upgrade the website, it certainly makes a fuckton more PR sense.

None of the success in sales has been attributed to a relentless focus on making good pizza. 

The Browns are sorely missing wide receiver Rashard Higgins, out four weeks with a knee injury, and had to make do instead with Antonio Callaway,

What I find really interesting is that after last season featured the new offensive boom really taking flight, almost all the top teams this season are defined by their defenses. Of course offense still matters, and would be the reason I would pick NE or GB over the Niners in a game, but it is for me this intriguing

and (b) compelled whoever’s in charge to slot the Browns in four primetime games this season

It’s also a fuckton easier and cheaper to update a website/app than it is a hundred-year old building. It’s going to cost Chicago over a billion dollars to update a bunch of train stations just along one line to make them ADA compliant (among other things). It can’t cost even one full percent of that to update a

It’s the “principle,” as it always is with these fucks. Who knows who else the government might start requiring them to treat like human beings?

Meet Domino’s new CEO (This Guy is def a Trumpster): NOTE: “Much of the success in sales has been attributed to Domino’s relentless focus on harnessing technology when it comes to the pizza delivery experience.” 

The company said in its appeal that the ADA “does not demand full accessibility for each and every means of accessing the goods or services a public accommodation provides to the public,”

Screen reading software can be unreliable at times, but, if you want to stay in business, work your shit out Dominos (over 2 billion in yearly earnings) and the same to all of the businesses out there who want money from the Disabled.

How much does a web developer that specializes in designing websites for people with disabilities cost? $120K? $200K? That is probably cheaper than fighting this lawsuit, plus no bad publicity. 

For fucks sake is there no fast food chain anymore that isn’t owned by some people hating shit bag?

There is that, too. I think they fear their base, but I think they fear’em more than they need to (I’m talking state pols and congresscritturs).

Obviously, a big chunk of the GOP base was in line with a big chunk of the electorate generally, in that they were desperate to get away from the neocon/neolib centrist

I’m a 51 year old man who owns a lightsaber, several droids, a robotic dinosaur, and at least 3 pairs of Star Wars boxers - one of which I am currently wearing.

Apparently, it wasn’t even because he was on the Z1. The article mentions other competitors on it as well. The dispute weirdly seems to come down to the fact that he obtained the Z1 nefariously. It seems like if he had earned the Z1 legitimately, then he wouldn’t have been penalized for using it. So the suspension

I have the sudden and profound urge to go out onto my lawn to see if anyone is on it, and if there is, to yell at them to get off of it.

Eh, I’m fine with each bike having advantages/disadvantages. It becomes Chun-Li vs. Ryu. If you want to use Chun-Li? Fine. Sagat? Go for it. Pick whichever Character (Bike) fits your fighting (Riding) style.

Technically you could argue the same thing about actual bike racing, although I suppose actual bike racing probably lacks one bike that’s specifically better than every other one (and has sweet lights).

The only thing in this article that I completely believe:

Exactly. My point is that we have to see out our existing obligations but stop pretending war is easy, and only get involved when we really, really need to (like WWII).