I'm genuinely surprised, thanks for that.

Here is a great post by another person responding to my comment who summed it up quite well.

I agree. And yes, they really do need to be paid more fairly, but this problem exists for any mass Chinese manufacturer.

Read the other comments, and sub comments. Many say since its a Nexus phone, it doesn't matter, or regarding the memory availability and micro SD, they say everything is on the cloud. Android in general, is not as efficient. For most iOS devices, you don't even need to worry about battery life, that was clearly proven…

I personally own a Galaxy nexus, various iOS devices and what not, but never found myself to be reliant on a microSD slot (as everything is on the cloud these days). The removable battery, I kind of understand (iOS devices always have amazing battery out of the box, so I never really worried about them), my nexus and…

In that logic, Rapidshare should have gone down, perhaps even before Megaupload. Megaupload offered many more services, higher speeds etc for free. Meanwhile to achieve similar speeds/services, you had to pay on Rapidshare. Who is getting more money out of it?

Can you please give the government's report then? I highly doubt they did that, but I want solid proof.

Each and everyone of them have the same problems. The thing is, Apple has 20x more demand than any other of those companies, that's why they are always in the spotlight. It's very hard to gather many people (thousands upon thousands) to make up for the demand of Apple products. That is the main reason why they cannot…

You are forgetting that it's very hard to find thousands of workers and gather them in one area to create electronics. Apple clearly stated once before, it's not about where they build the gadgets, it about how many they can gather in one place TO build those gadgets.

It's funny to see many Android fanatics now say the mediocre memory availability and lack of removable battery is ok, but when it comes to the iPhone, its like a rage concert on these sites.

When was he paying users for uploading illigal material? I never heard of that. I do, however, know that the media producers had access to megaupload servers to take down illigal uploads. This was talked about in the interview and proven online.

Wrong. The media producers actually had ACCESS to megaupload servers to take down anything they wanted. This was talked about in their interview, and proven online.

If any one watched the interview and looked at the facts posted up, Kim dotcom cannot be held responsible for what people upload online. This is the same for any online web host. It's ridiculous how far this has gone, and little by little, it's been shown that the take down was illigal from the start.

Yep, I act like a 12 year old when I see bullshit online, and respond with similar bullshit to make them angry. Worked, it seems. ICS was in no way shape or form a bad OS, and I checked this on my friends Galaxy S3 when he flashed the JB rom up. He did get better scores, but not by much.. The fact these phones have…

No credibility? Coming from a person who originally posted a bullshit image claiming it to be proof? If you actually read anything I wrote before, I said look at the poster and I responded to him. I did post up over 10 articles, which you never saw. Want more proof? Just tell me, but it is hilarious if you don't know…

Again, you are missing a huge point. You are comparing objects which have become a "standard" in the world, to objects which are not. Things which you can make completely differently from the competitors. The point you made about ford being the first, is completely wrong. Apple didn't come out with the first smart…

Before the iPhone, mobile phones were clunky, ugly devices with hard to use software. The hardware was feeble, navigating and using the software interface with tiny buttons was pathetic at best. The iPhone changed all that: a processor as fast as a Pentium III, tons of RAM, fantastic physical design and gorgeous…

I agree, not every thing is legal or illigal, but in this case you are not even remotely an expert. When the decision was handed down on most of Apple's cases, stock analysts, lawyers, IT professionals, judge/jury all agreed that most of the cases were in Apple's favor, not just because of the patents. If you have…

Haha what a amusing fellow you are. If you even remotely read my post, I said it's just as idiotic as your own image, yet I can claim is "proof" just like you did. I provided several articles in one of my other posts below you I believe. Feel free to check it out. Oh, and as for the "standard," I very well do agree,…

I stated before, yes they have been inspired by other companies before but unlike today's market, most of the competitors products are more or less mainly coming from Apple's work, which is unacceptable. As for the shape ordeal, Apple sued because of such a similar design between the two phones, since the…