dusparr
dusparr
dusparr

It was one of the running on floor display models at pax. Unless they had a computer controlled lookalike that shut-off at the same time as the hardware fail. In which case props to them for over-engineering a problem that definitely did not need to be solved.

as I have said in other threads linked to this :

Could be yea.

For me it was a sudden shutdown, no beep nothing, just straight to black and it had to be unplugged before it would play again, I watched the guy reset it.

Had one die on me while I was playing (Ryse), and another had to be cycled on/off before I could play it.

Had one die on me while I was playing (Ryse), and another had to be cycled on/off before I could play it.

Considering that there was overheating issues at PAX? I kinda doubt this will be any better than the 360.

Nope, MS does not allow replacement of Internal Drives.

Happy to Oblige!

vSo for the Pax Pox, we at Digipen have a specialized version of it: the DigiPlague.

I would, but talking in a mirror is kind of awkward.

Um... No that would be Fair Use, as the target is the Person and not the Idea. If the person claimed to represent the Idea and not Themselves as the Idea, we would have a different end result.

Actually that depends on the Con (or if it is indeed public places), most conventions only require "Casual Consent" for pictures to be made.

Actually, that is not strictly true, at most events (Sporting etc), you have agreed to a contract that says that all pictures you take are co-owned by the event. This is what you would be referring to.

No cosplayer involved, photographer suing.

Well, to be fair, he will have to show that he had permission from the Cosplayer and the owner of whatever event they were at (unless it is public), or he cannot claim ownership of the picture, unless he kept it private or within "limited peer groups." In those cases, he has a case, purely from the fact that he would

Photographers are suing, not the cosplayers.

It is not the cosplayer, but the photographer suing.