Perhaps the author isn’t familiar with the democratic principle of “innocent until proven guilty.” Yet she is proceeding from the position that the accused, by way of the accusation, is guilty, and they must suffer for it until they can prove their innocence. This is why #MeToo is a reactionary, right-wing campaign,…

Several years ago this article would have been titled. “Gamer gets two world records for her game collection.” Glad she has her records, nothing taken away, but I’m pretty sure a photo with the story would have been as sensational as it needed to be.

So you’re admitting to writing a clickbait headline? If you don’t expect your audience to even do something as simple as look at the image of the article, then perhaps writing for this outlet isn’t as impactful as you think?

He’s, quite literally, DISCUSSING IT.

I would argue that none of these villains needs a Joker Cruella-style spin-off.

That’s what I thought. Then I read the long version of the article.

Oh, so now we’re embracing QAnon’s bullshit conspiracy theories?

Achieved what? Taking federal subsidies and calling it rugged free market determination? That’s old hat.

Yes, that’s right — the very same Kalashnikov behind the iconic AK-47 assault rifle that gave the Wehrmacht a kicking at Stalingrad, and became a favorite amongst insurgents and firearms enthusiasts around the world thanks to its relative simplicity.

As a Dynasty Warriors fan, I love that the characters kept their signature looks from the games, to the point where even smaller story characters like Yuan Shao are instantly recognizable.

They were claiming and “advertising” 2,000 dollar checks after the 600 had already been sent out. I hear a lot of people claiming this but the timeline doesn’t line up.

I couldn’t stand Trump and I’m not expecting hard hitting political journalist from Kotaku, so nothing against this article or anything. (I know it’s just in good fun) But this is such a great example of what the next 4 years in the media is going to look like for Biden.

It baffles me that I keep encountering the idea that this woman is somehow the underdog or even a hero after this moment of colossal and self-inflicted fuckery.

What someone “deserves” is a moral stance, not a legal one. I’m advocating for the separation of the two issues.

Why did she “deserve” it? How about instead acknowledging that there’s a problem with the LAW, not with what she did?

This seems more accurate and it is very disappointing. I am to the point where I assume that a majority of the police force were sympathizers and that is scary.

Trump needs to be arrested for treason\sedition right now.

He’s “alleged” to have committed a crime that in some, but not many, jurisdictions can be considered sexual assault, the statute of limitations for which has since run out and he’s never been convicted of— and the accusation was probably cooked up by the CIA in the first place.

People on this site are sometimes strange. Everybody will fight against the current criminal system in the USA and wants to de-fund the Police. But when it comes to a guy like Assange, all of the sudden torture by the fascists is ok. I really don’t get it sometimes.

Spare us the BS. So, you’re now equating being imprisoned with torture. Nice.