People in general don’t “allow” themselves to become fat. Access to high quality, nutritious food is a privilege reserved only for the top 10 percent, and when you’re working 60 - 80 hours a week there’s very little time for exercise, especially if you have a family.

It’s not my job to prove your argument. That’s on you.

Your comment makes no sense.

Trying to insult me does little to help your argument.

You’re just making things up. I hold no brief for the CCP bureaucracy or the Putin regime. And you have all the hallmarks of a fascist: xenophobia, rabid anti-communism, and a pro-imperialist outlook.

Okay, thanks for trying. Take care!

There isn’t any data to support your claims.

You have no idea if her allegations are true, so your complaint is empty.

In any court. That’s why it’s a fundamental human right.

Oh, I didn’t realize I was talking to a fascist.

Due process is a fundamental human right, regardless of whether or not it’s protected by bourgeois law.

People often resort to insults in order to paper over the fact that they really have no idea what they’re talking about. You’re also missing (or ignoring) the central point of my argument. Manson has the right to due process; he has the right to innocence until proven guilty; and the media’s role is to erode these…

Do you believe that Manson is innocent? Or rather, do you believe he should be presumed innocent until his guilt has been proven?

“She said that while such a response is not uncommon, there is no data on exactly how often it happens.”

Unless you have something serious to contribute, move along.

“Many” and yet you don’t cite a single instance. Regardless of the implausibility, Manson has the right to face his accuser. He has the right to due process, and the right to innocence until proven guilty. The right-wing promoters of #MeToo seek to invert this by making the accused guilty until they can prove their…

Why? Manson hasn’t been convicted of a crime. We have no idea if these allegations are true or false.

The allegations are completely implausible when viewed with the fact that she remained in contact with Manson, went to his shows, etc, following the first alleged incident. It also should be stated that allegations are not proof of anything, and Manson should have the right to face his accuser.

The company doesn’t have sufficient cause, because the accused hasn’t been convicted of any crime.

Another hysterical internet fascist, incapable of addressing the content of an argument, instead resorting to idiotic insults. Try harder.