dunemimoore
Dunemi
dunemimoore

I completely disagree with you that cheating is un-fucking-forgiveable. Plenty of people have forgiven their partners for cheating and had stronger relationships afterward. Can't you picture yourself making a mistake one day, and hoping to be forgiven for it?

For the most part, I totally agree with you. I was responding to the OP saying that people shouldn't get married if they're going to cheat. I just thought it was a weirdly obnoxious thing to say. As if they know what will happen, "oh yeah, five years from now I'll totes b cheating". It just made me want to point out

Why would you say this to me? What did I say that's all that different from what you're saying? Be cool, man.

You're telling me to fuck off? Let me tell you something, I have never cheated on anyone, ever. However I have been cheated on, people in my family have been cheated on, and I understand how that can feel. But I also don't think it's the end of the world. Families can recover from mistakes. And there are many types of

"Wow you're getting really carried away, honey." - oeffoff

Yes, I'm sorry, I saw what happened after I went back and re-read the thread.

"Supposed to have sex with the person you married..." yes, that's why it's cheating, because you're breaking the rules. But just because you can't live within the rules 100% doesn't mean you shouldn't try to have a good marriage and don't deserve the happiness of a spouse and family life. I mean, you're pretty harsh.

Where did it say anything about the French opinion on poly relationships? Didn't the article reference extra-marital affairs?

I was just using the same generalities as the article. Jeez. I will re-state, "If the French who don't feel sexual infidelity is a moral issue, don't feel it's a moral issue, then for them, it's not". Satisfied?

So you're only allowed to have a life-partner and a stable family IF and ONLY IF you can stand having sex with one person for the rest of your life. Grow up. If the French feel it's not a moral issue, then for them, it's not.

I cannot agree with you more. I was at a brunch last month where I swear 80% of the conversation revolved around taking pictures and then showing everyone around you the picture. And then taking more pictures.

I liked it. The pacing was very nice, the characters were interesting. I actually enjoyed reading it.

They look like the same tent. The. Same. Tent. Why the $8000 diff?

This is so true! My nose used to get so raw when I had a cold until I switched to hankies - now my nose is fine. I think the problem is that tissues are made from wood pulp, which is microscopically sharp, and rips up your nose with a million tiny daggers.

Good for you! I was worried because you said it was the last task you ever did for him. I had an employer ask me to do something unethical, and when I rebelled against it, people told me not to fall on my sword. F them. I can sleep at night, too! :-)

So, you did it? You lied on the report and quit the next day? Or you quit because he asked you to lie?

I don't think this will destroy the relationship. If his point (and I think it is) is that he doesn't want the home-cooked meal anyway and therefore shouldn't have to clean up after it, then he's already stated that he prefers take-out/frozen. All I'm say she should do is ask him to stand by his stated preference. If

I totally agree with this advice. Make yourself the food you want, carefully pack up the leftovers for your lunch at work the next day, and let him fend for himself. He really needs to learn that both partners have to help when both partners benefit.

Ok, but I wouldn't be surprised that the more they study the specific link between artificial sweeteners and insulin resistance or diabetes related conditions, the more causal links they find. It takes a while to design a good study that can narrow the results sufficiently to find cause.