dummytext01
Dummy Text
dummytext01

A few issues:

Those (dys)functional side vents look like a great addition to the GT!

A lot of these things look like someone decided they were an engineer and that they could just plop things on the car that look aero. Maybe I'm wrong, it just doesn't look purpoesful.

No. No they don't.

hate to be that guy, but I'm glad I posted this over a day ago.

I can attest to Real Racing. I played through it a LOT when I had nothing to do at work. Great response, and different cars drive differently (though I can't speak for how it compares to the real-life versions). I got through a good 70% of all the races in it (which there are very many of) and the difficulty level

I swear I read this somewhere as well... not just you

Bla bla bla bla LOAD BAR..... bla bla bla bla LOAD BAR.... repeat repeat

It was more a reference to their similarity, I didn't mean the exact ones used on this car.

way better thank you

What a MASSIVE disappointment. While an understated design on a vehicle can be a great thing, this is a bit much. THat fender vent stolen from a Captiva? Seriously? Chrome wheels, what is this the 2000's? This car is so far behind on styling, and then there isn't even a manual?
There was so much potential here.

this should be in chicago where the show is!

Definitely, performance is where I meant to compare, though I honestly don't remember where the c6 z left off on price. Either way, as a vette fan I still think it is sad to see the nissan move more and more unattainable. It was more fun comparing them that way, and everyone should have at least some chance at a

Considering the c6 base was 20k less than the original gtr price, idk if that was ever a doubt. Though the z 06 would probably be a better comparison

True that import costs etc cause the 'vette to be more expensive, but a similar thing happens coming over to this side of the pond as well, albeit not to as much of a degree. It's a bummer it works that way, as price point is one of the selling points of the car in the first place.

I'd just like to point out I prefer the plastic. Cheaper, easier to repair, light... Many sports cars use plastics. Vettes regularly hit the 200k+ miles on the clock. I wouldn't call that bad build quality. It isn't meant to be a luxury ride with premium fit and finish inside. I wouldn't call that "shitly" though.

I'm so my school doesn't have anything with fsae

While it looks better in the wild than it did in the show room (I think overall it looks awesome) I still can't get over taht busy rear end. Also, in the wild it looks even more like a camaro. I hate to say that as it is so cliche now, but it really does.

Fucking amazing, I laughed so hard.

I really like your ideas and both look great. I personally wouldn't choose those any more than the actual ones, but you show creativity especially on the first ones you posted. My point is that there is so much creativity out there that they could have come up with a better design. I like yours better than the real

Came here to post this, though an aerial view would also be nice to show.