there’s a guy outside who says he needs to be in here

Actually GTFO would be a badge I could go for

Bondo, James Bondo.

Yo momma so nasty, she keeps a separate email server for her side pieces

“As for discrepancies between all three men’s stories, Baute said that was proof they were telling the truth because liars would have coordinated better.”

I’ve kept up with a lot of this and thus far I think there would be enough shit distractions to avoid a judgement, but then, there’s this:

“Hi! It looks like you’re trying to run an A-2 Gap Slant? Would you like help running an A-2 Gap Slant?”

“Tim Tebow Saves First Base For Marriage”

Ophthalmologist: Something wrong?

No, I mean literally. Props to Bauer are what got him in this mess.

That’s what’s strange to me. I can see ways at least some of this testimony should have been admissible for the question of liability (Doe’s statements would be admissible as an opposing party admission, and testimony as to her truthfulness admissible for impeachment purposes).

From a legal standpoint, certain testimony can only be used for certain purposes. The average juror, however, is an idiot. Rose’s lawyers know that once the jurors hear this testimony, it will forever color their view of the entire case, regardless of whether they can use it to prove who’s version of the events is…