duchessbakesacake
duchessbakesacake
duchessbakesacake

Cancun Inn/Sugar Loaf village are in my hometown (Warwick, NY). I don’t know the woman, but many people in town will tell you that Alvin Goldstein is a fucking nutjob. I’ve been to this restaurant. Many of my classmates in high school worked there. I’ve only ever experienced warmth and good service at this place.

Also note the difference in responses:

Hasan, Roy Williams jr, Jordan Klepper, Dedi lydic and the girl who does the politcal commentary.... she is great. I want more of her. Also Ronny Chieng!

uh, it’s a play on #brexit, but with a #p, get it?

Oh, don’t you feel stupid now. It’s her YA novel.

Perfect use is 96% effective. Cause duh, if you don’t pull out, it doesn’t fucking work. People who know their bodies, know their partner, and communicate well - we’re getting that 96% or pretty damn close. Teenagers, drunk sex, and idiots drag down the rest of us down to typical - high 70's. Which is still pretty

The Nurse Practitioner at the Planned Parenthood I went to when I first started having sex told me it was the most effective way to prevent pregnancy, when done correctly. (The problem is that it is not always done correctly.)

fuck off

There’s no reason why an artist (and a group of artists, cast/crew/directors/theatre staff, etc) should not be properly compensated for their work. You can love your art and also want to be fairly paid. He’s taking issue with the third party that is turning a profit off of their hard work.

I think he would be quite happy that his show is one of the most popular Broadway productions of all times. I’m just going to guess.

She is the only person I have ever liked better because of Twitter. She’s so goddamn good at Twitter.

Your point is an interesting, though uncomfortable one — sorry you’re getting piled on. I usually find myself rolling my eyes at the “Wow that sucks, so here’s a picture of MY PET BUNNY WABBIT!” posts on news about deeply tragic shit. I never respond because I know I’ll get piled on.

No I read it. She straight up said it was too hard for her so she was going to ignore the story for her own sake and instead talk about cake. I think that’s tacky and gross. I'm done arguing with you about it though, obviously you think that's cool, and I think it's self-absorbed.

Because it’s completely narcissistic to take something horrendous that happened to someone else and make it about you and your cake. If your way to “process” is by needing validation of your narcissism I'm going to judge.

What's the point of a comment like this? You aren't the only one to do it, sometimes people make it about animals or gifs...but why? If the article bothers you so much that you can't comment on it, then why don't you just not comment? Why try to get attention for your feelings and your cake on an article about someone

Its almost like the point of the primary is to make a choice of who is better between the given candidates and to do so requires you to compare and contrast them and to determine who fits more closely to your belief system.

Your own analysis seems to ignore the very glaring fact that when people try to have a substantial conversations about Clinton’s legitimate short comings as a politician, public servant, and candidate, they get hand-waved away in favor of the dominant narrative that people just hate her because she’s a woman. Its been

Define viable? Sanders often polls higher than Clinton in a matchup against Trump. Unless you have a diffirent definition of “viable” then the one I have?

Exactly. I’m a woman about to be stripped of my vagina for not getting in line behind war and Neoliberal policies.

It’s very hard to both acknowledge that Clinton’s popularity is mired by sexist attitudes about women in public life, and that there are also other reasons why folks distrust her or dislike her. If you bring up one of these points, people tend to hit you over the head with the other fact, as if they can’t both be