dubelabup
dubelabup
dubelabup

I've eaten in some very dodgy places in my (short so far) life. But consequently I probably have an immune system of iron. Pfft - hygiene.

I hope I meet a woman to have a 70 year relationship with :(.

I'm gay and didn't notice it at all. And can't help but think that all this stuff is retrospective 'I knew it all along!' - even JK Rowling didn't know until she decided to write it in.

Then why is it that the highest rate of orgasm is that of straight men?

They're not advertising for a "food scientist", they're advertising a PhD studentship in a specific field. They didn't need to use the term 'food scientist'.

Sure but surely you can recognise that when you said she was suggesting it was sexist, you were wrong??

Nobody deserves "male privileges".

I agree, but that just shows the importance of 'intersectionality'. In my view, class is fundamental to society in a way nothing else is. I am likely to have far more in common overall with someone in a similar economic and educational position no matter their sex, race, orientation, whatever, than I am with someone

Biology is at the core of the female experience in so many ways, and it is the very basis for much of the way in which women are socialised as a gender - reproduction, hormones, periods, and (in my view, crucially) comparative physical weakness. It is what separates us biologically from men that has allowed us to be

Attempting and failing male socialisation does not mean that you have been socialised as a woman. Being a woman does not mean 'not being a man'.

Exceptions to the rule do not disprove the rule.

Because that is the specific basis on which women as a group are defined and treated by society. Our natural physical differences, including (in my view, crucially) our decisive physical weakness as compared to men. Our ability to give birth - having a vagina, a uterus, ovaries, and everything associated with that.

whoosh

She's not a model. Alexander McQueen was no Adonis either.

" A woman who is attracted to you will smile, look away, touch her hair, and look at you again."

No, we're not. This is what you said:

I know you weren't referring to autism, which is why your posts are wrong. I wasn't 'reading autism into' your post, I was noting that you have incorrectly described psychopathy. There is a difference between 'empathy' and 'understanding'. Psychopaths and sociopaths understand perfectly well what e.g. sadness *is*.

No, she doesn't look super unhealthy. I see people all the time who are naturally thin like that. She is a model. She's going to be selected because she has a nice physique. I'm sorry your perception of weight is so skewed.

I think you're mixing up 'sociopath' with 'autistic'. Sociopaths understand incredibly well the emotions of other people - their ability for emotional manipulation is specifically one of their traits. Psychopath murderers are so horrible because they get off on power and humiliation, they don't just kill like any

2/10, would not bang