If you are a 17 year old boy they accelerate faster than the space shuttle. You just have to believe.

Cubby was written so often it now sounds dirty to me.
I feel unclean now that I’ve even typed that word.

You can think of this as a good move by Tesla (I do) and also wonder about where it may lead down the road, and in other hands.

“The move was praiseworthy and appropriate, but at the root of the gesture lies a terrifying prospect of our automotive future.”

“It was genuinely helpful and an extremely savvy public relations move for the company.”

The article acknowledged that this was a helpful move from the company multiple times. It used this…

I don’t think that Justin was blasting Tesla and wasn’t trying to imply that. I just found it humorous that he praised the action, then jumped directly to the line I quoted. I thought there may be a bit of hyperbole there. While the concerns are valid, this future is still pretty far ahead of us and, as of now, the…

I’m not sure there’s a scenario where I would feel bad for individuals who can afford these level of cars.

no way in hell a 4Runner can tow this.

Add lightness.

“Suboptimal for city traffic?” I beg to differ:

Another example of the owner being underwater with their car purchase.

available 4cyl

Well then your stock srt4 neon gets an automatic fine because it came stock with no mufflers

The SRT4 Neon had no muffler. Stock.

“Bro what’s that gunk on your tire?”

Here it is everyone! The very first Altima!!! Stop drooling and get out your checkbooks. We’ll start the bids at $35000.

If you’re not willing to wear a helmet while operating a car/truck/tractor/bicycle/horse/racing snail/etc. then you really have no business nannying a motorcyclist who chooses to let the wind flow through their hair.

Could you lend that soapbox you’re up on there to some people down in Houston? They’re currently up to their necks in dirty ass water and just trying to find some food to survive.

What does it look like to you on the ground there in Houston? Hope you’re holding up okay.

I just want to make sure I understand your point: Trump is wrong to reconsider a regulation providing multiple options for consideration that hadn’t yet gone into effect because of a weather event that exceeds all three of the regulations options?

If we are talking less than 2% added to the cost, as the article states, then it’s a no brainer, build to the higher standards, but if we are talking 10-20%, then yeah, maybe think about it, but in the long run it should still be cheaper if you survive the next flood.