Say what you will about affirmative action, but it is the very height of absurdity that the “Personal Achievement Index” includes race among its factors. Congratulations on being black (or whatever) ... you did it!

It was really brave of that one guy who has a micropenis towards the bottom left of the picture to be willing to be naked in public.

While I agree that it is foolish to be scared away because a kid smoked weed, I think that was just the straw that broke the camel’s back. This is a guy who apparently racked up a variety of NCAA violations (however absurd those rules may be) and had domestic violence charges brought against him by his stepfather and…

I find it odd that it’s okay to throw around “WASP” as a pejorative.

Your point about how they’d be in legal limbo and thus barred from using either bathroom is a good one that I hadn’t thought of (one of those obvious points once you’ve heard it articulated that you wish you had come up with yourself).

That’s not how things work for an addict. You can accurately state that a potential NFL career means that he has a lot at stake, but addicts put everything at risk and can’t stop themselves.

Wow what a great start! Bet the Texans are thrilled that this happened already.

Yeah I agree. Maybe my comment was poorly written. I don’t understand why some people still tailgate like that when they DO have the chance to just go around, is what I meant.

I don’t think this applies when there is ample opportunity to pass the car in front by the would-be-tailgater by simply going around the car in front (it is lazy not to just go around in this situation, although sometimes there isn’t a chance to pass, in which case I say definitely move over).

Not strictly accurate.

I liked her well enough.

What the heck is this part? And why isn’t the pee-hole also labeled “G-Spot”?

I trust that those I’ve heard articulate the principle were using it properly, notwithstanding your very impressive studies (I’m truly awestruck by you though).

Do you find it problematic that there are like 50 things that have to be explained away? That’s what gets me. They may have pulled some real shady moves to get him convicted, but there’s a lot going on here. So many different things that the defense has to deal with, not all of which were the result of police /…

The whole point, I think, that J Todd Ricardo has been trying to make, is that - while a finding of “not guilty” may have been the appropriate verdict in this case - there are nonetheless a bunch of individual things that make it look like he did it.

“He’s slightly more likely than you or I to have committed the crime because he was in the right county at the time, but that’s about all the evidence there is.”

Um, why exactly can’t you allow different bits of circumstantial evidence to create a larger picture of guilt? Although it is a civil concept, the idea of Res Ipsa Loquitur (sp?) seems fitting. No, on an island those individual bits of information do not merit a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but for…

I agree with the sentiment that people - in perhaps what is an understandable, visceral reaction to blatant police and prosecutorial misconduct - have gone overboard in their investment in his actual innocence. There’s a lot going against him, much of it inadmissible or ignored in the documentary.

“Many of them take on higher levels of student debt than their white peers, often to pay for routine expenses, such as textbooks, that their parents are less likely to subsidize.”

Guillfoyle?