Dude, I’m an attorney. You don’t write coherently.

What country are you from?

You must be fun to be around at parties...

Are you really claiming that Americans don’t know what a yard is? Hint: Americans are obsessed with something that takes place on a field that is 100 yards long, and you need 10 yards for a 1st down, and can get a 5, 10 or 15-yard penalty. Americans know exactly what a yard is in practice and practical application.…

Wow. Bill Maher gets a huge kick out of people like this. SJW’s on crack!

Meh, I’ve lost 110 pounds over the past 18 or so months by counting calories and tracking cardio using MFP for a “net calories” number that I aimed to stay below. That goal “net” calorie count was so low, 1,700, that even when I went bust by a few hundred calories I was still going to be a net negative for the day. I…

What the heck is this part? And why isn’t the pee-hole also labeled “G-Spot”?

How is this article politicizing anything?

Yeah, that’s a big deal. I couldn’t figure that out, either.

I trust that those I’ve heard articulate the principle were using it properly, notwithstanding your very impressive studies (I’m truly awestruck by you though).

Who cares about him being kinky? That’s not why I mentioned that! Face it, if the nephew himself brought up the sexy-time chains as being a part of a brutal rape/murder (rather than that having been “planted” into his head by the cops during that interrogation), and Avery happened to have recently purchased sexy-time…

Do you find it problematic that there are like 50 things that have to be explained away? That’s what gets me. They may have pulled some real shady moves to get him convicted, but there’s a lot going on here. So many different things that the defense has to deal with, not all of which were the result of police /…

The whole point, I think, that J Todd Ricardo has been trying to make, is that - while a finding of “not guilty” may have been the appropriate verdict in this case - there are nonetheless a bunch of individual things that make it look like he did it.

“He’s slightly more likely than you or I to have committed the crime because he was in the right county at the time, but that’s about all the evidence there is.”

Um, why exactly can’t you allow different bits of circumstantial evidence to create a larger picture of guilt? Although it is a civil concept, the idea of Res Ipsa Loquitur (sp?) seems fitting. No, on an island those individual bits of information do not merit a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, but for…

I agree with the sentiment that people - in perhaps what is an understandable, visceral reaction to blatant police and prosecutorial misconduct - have gone overboard in their investment in his actual innocence. There’s a lot going against him, much of it inadmissible or ignored in the documentary.

Let’s be honest, the fact that he had chains combined with the statements by his nephew to the police (however awful their interrogation techniques were and however unreliable that made the “confession”) is about as damning as it gets.

I think he and his attorneys were out of their minds not to demand a mistrial when presented with the option to do so.

You know who was absolutely atrocious and committed clear malpractice? The nephew’s first Court-appointed attorney. My skin was crawling when he was making statements to the press.

They don’t conduct trials in appellate Courts, son.