it kinda sucked..

The thing is that not everybody’s situation is the same. There could be some that have the ability to move somewhere else and maybe some have already but to assume all of them still have enough money to do so, have a support system, are able to work, have no problems with their vehicle, etc. doesn’t make much sense. 

How in the world did the Figaro not make this list?

Looks like an Urus knockoff

All valid, especially when it comes to the safety aspect. Just wanted to point out that it’s a problem with many layers and since some of those include systemic issues, governments are ultimately the ones who have the power to address them in an effective and humane way. 

I agree that people should take care of the spaces they reside in but when it comes to being in that situation in the first place, it wasn’t the preferred choice for many. The well-off van lifers are either still roaming around or decided to do something else. A lot of the people at these parks started living in a van…

I wouldn’t say highway driving in a Wrangler is fun. 

the media purposely lies

Not sure when pointer-outer of evidenceless/fake news became synonymous with Tesla stan, but sure.

There are a lot of people who would rather put $70k into their FD RX7 than buy a new Cayman/M3 or other equivalent vehicle for the same money.

Writer on a car culture site shits on a would-rather-waste-money-making-it-look-worse-than-buying-something-better car culture kind of car.

I know you’re Jalopnik’s #1 Tesla stan but even you have to admit the company isn’t exactly trustworthy. Especially considering how they lied about recordings remaining anonymous. 

Oof. Working with Amy Schumer would feel like an automatic demotion to me. To be clear though, I wasn’t saying it looks bad. I was just curious about who they’re targeting. Usually, with movies like Shrek or the Lego movie, it’s mostly for kids but they have some subtle dialogue/jokes scattered in there that make it…

lol Really trying to justify owning your Tesla, huh?

Do both

Yep, same with the GTiR :)

I’ll take this guy instead

I can see that. Hopefully, the innuendo isn’t the entire movie. 

I guess I’m trying to figure out what the studio’s goal was. It’s a children’s IP but the dialogue doesn’t seem as “subtle” as in movies like Shrek or others.

Who is this for?