That’s a cool looking cat. I have a friend that has the same type of setup. He has a cordless mower and the rare times he needs to use it, he charges the batteries via solar in his shed.

I consider it a superpower when you’re able to tell the exact states where these homes are located. Besides, you can find these lawns all over the country, including the PNW and others areas where drought isn’t a concern. Nice try, though. lol, Since when is using less water and energy an “anecdotal narrative”? I…

This for starters. Even if you have kids, the very least you can do is change the front and keep the backyard so they can still play. If you don’t use your lawn at all then there really is no point of having one. The point is to minimize the amount of water used from the county. You can add a rain catcher for when you…

lol Sorry but you’re in the minority. You ever drive across the country? Most people don’t use them. And it’s not subjective if the alternative sees more use and efficiency. There are also these things called parks that can be used by everybody. So. There.

Or just don’t have a lawn in the first place. The amount of water and energy used to maintain grass that barely gets used is absolutely ridiculous. There are better and more tasteful ways of using that space.

TL;DR: useless drivel.

Seriously? Talking about people attacking you and “a battle fated”? Your initial comment was trollish and now you’re being overly dramatic for some reason. It’s pretty simple - you voluntarily decided to visit a page about iOS keyboards and you proceeded to regurgitate the same Android vs. Apple…

Jesus, not this shit again

“But a component cause is a cause.”

at night..

It’s important to point out that with Hideman VPN, they keep logs in the free version. I think two VPNs that are better than those listed are PIA and NordVPN.

Just because something does not have a 100% certainty of happening does not mean it does not cause it. For instance, tanning beds cause cancer and smoking cause cancer, but not everyone who smokes or use tanning beds gets cancer.”

There’s no such thing as pedantic when it comes to scientific evidence, especially when talking about something like cancer. You don’t know what people are going to take from incorrect titles. However, if you’re saying that they will see the “shorthand” of a title like that, then why not put the right one in the first…

Not sure what you mean by “perspective”. It is factually wrong to say something is a certainty when science shows that it isn’t.

There’s no gray area. Communicating the facts correctly is paramount. Otherwise, you’re left with a game of telephone where they get misunderstood and misinterpreted which does more harm…

Wrong. As it’s been stated before, there are other factors to consider, which is why they call it a risk and not a certainty. Besides, this article isn’t talking about excessive drinking. So, none of what you said make it a “case closed”.

The reality is that smoking increases your risk of cancer but it doesn’t guarantee you’ll get it. As with alcohol, it’s dependent on other factors as well including genetics.

Concerning people’s behavior, many will continue to take part in risky activities regardless of their knowledge of the risk. They will continue…

That’s cute but I’ve been here for a while. The truth is that Lifehacker has been pretty good in avoiding the clickbait stuff. It’s not perfect but it’s also not like the rest of the Gawker sites.

“If you had read to the end of the sentence, you would have seen: “there is a broad scientific consensus that alcohol is a carcinogen.”

Even considering that, your title is still wrong. To borrow an explanation from a cancer research company:

Clickbait, like what you find on Buzzfeed, isn’t really common on this site and it should stay that way.

“It’s hard to prove that anything causes cancer for sure”

Then you should change the title of the post to, “Just a Reminder: Alcohol Can Cause Cancer”. Unless you’re just looking for clicks.

Even across the country, they still don’t go everywhere planes do. They’re also a lot slower, so maybe you should try again, dumbass.