I was very pleased to catch it on netflix during it's brief tenure there. I really liked it and, knowing nothing of it, was pretty shocked by how it all worked out. Throw some cross-gender rather than just cross-class cross dressing and you'd have been pretty close to Shakespeare in weirdness but going a bit farther…

Is the obscure wick trimming attachment no one asks for or uses Barry Lyndon?

I just learned about it from this write up! Don't know how I missed it despite loving the episode so much. I guess time…

They do, but those scenes tend to be successful in a discouraging way.

It's also true that you can find someone who shares your religious project without sharing your religion.

Don't Want Entertainment to Contain a Large Part of What Happens in Real Life?

Except that Go kicks the shit out of chess whilst simultaneously being somehow more boring.

Technically an aristocracy is a sub-form of oligarchy. You could contrast an aristocracy (rule by the best) with plutocracy (rule by the richest) with bureaucracy (rule by people with desks).

So… how close is it to Shoot 'em Up with different accents and suit styles? Close enough? Or too fucking far away?

Yeah he as an individual and then the overall vibe of Community as a gestalt.

Also the sleeves never fit or feel right and really diminish the experience.

So GDed beautiful.

I just think you're…

Well, there's a specific institutional and cultural connection there, but, on the whole, I'm grateful for it. I got very limited overlap with that faith, but man I love how that community has informed some of my genres.

I understand he is under some revision and probably deserves it, but I'm fairly suspicious of because 'he sort of was a regular person' as an biographical thrust.

Bwahahaha!

Yeah, Rogers & Giffen's series really really worked for me.

Nope, I think I can blame Grant. You're right in that Grant can't be blamed for the people 'with money' making their home with the Republicans, but Grant found the concern over money to be a comfortable position from which he could lead a party that otherwise had a diversity of other concerns. He picked the surer…

I think maybe I'm not understanding the stakes of your argument.

Not really…