But that’s the point of a super hero like Batman. They are an ideal to aspire to, so his goals are going to be unrealistic. Fighting crime AND not kill anyone doing it is pretty damn near impossible, but he does it because he’s the Goddamned Batman.

Hardware failure really isn’t that common, and most games still work offline, even if they’re missing features, so it’s incredibly cynical to say a game with online is “designed to fail.” It’s designed to be played online at the time, and eventually it has to be shut down. All technology eventually becomes obsolete,…

That’s just because the game development is butting heads with the technological limit, which is rapidly improving. It’s stupid to say a game is “designed to fail in a few years” just because it looks good now. Yes, some games (like Wind Waker) are smart, and go for a style that will age well, but even a lot of games…

Were there no better lines to use in the character banners for Ghostbusters?

It’s going to get the “well it’s all female so we can’t be too critical” bump. But yes, It’s going to blow.

The Ghostbusters movie is going to be awful isn’t it?

He said games, not game consoles. Games that were made 5, 10, 20 years ago can still be played. Even if they were speaking about consoles, the same is true. And sure, I’m sure there’s a bit of planned obsolescence, but that’s irrelevant. Technology just gets better. That’s how it works. It’s a very snide observation…

So how does a lack of bug fixes mean the games were “designed to fail?” If a game is buggy, it’s buggy. If it’s not, it’s not. It’s not like a game magically starts sprouting bugs, it’s no worse off 5 years later. Sure, the physical media can degrade if you use it a lot, but that’s true of everything physical. Games…

Yeah, it’s definitely trying way too hard and makes no sense

As a Batman fan, I take issue with a Batman that kills because it diminishes the character. Take away the no-kill rule and Batman is just The Punisher in a bat suit.

It’s been a key part of several major Batman storylines like Knightfall, where Azrael proves unworthy of the cowl because he crosses the line and kills a serial killer.

Shut up. Shut up and stop pretending that because you’ve seen a scan of a single panel of a Batman comic from 1939 that “Batman has always killed.” Batman hasn’t killed anyone since he’s had a backstory and a sidekick, ever since Whitney Ellsworth took over as Detective Comics’ editor in 1941. Stop pushing this…

Same. They could easily release a video giving contradicting information and have the same thing - which is something they’ve done for articles over the years.

Yeah but they really showed how games are all about money, while seeing how many views they got and asking you to like and subscribe to their channel, which has got to be THE most annoying new trend that has hit 95% of new YouTube videos

Not to mention soldiers in a war was where the bulk of his kills are from. Also no one really minds seeing Cap kill certain enemies, because a “no kill” code has never been considered a major aspect of the character. I would say having a clear distinction between enemy soldiers and enemy civilians is something I would…

so like half these aren’t kills, just because cap hits someone with his shield doesn’t mean they are instantly dead. then at the end when he says he doesn’t want to kill anyone..doesn’t mean that he won’t.

Do you remember the wait times before EZpass was a thing? I remember, 2-3 hours for any of the good rides was not unexpected. I am genuinely amazed that the lines are as fast today as they are.

Why even play the DZ if you are lvl 99?

“ because it was a choking hazard or something.”

I will agree that the Yosemite character scenes were excellent, but not enough to make up for the laughing and the... dancing.