No worries. I can see where you got confused. What I was saying was for a core Far Cry game, they could continue to evolve the series with some of these new systems but return it to a more contemporary survival setting.

IGN’s David F. Smith was the last great, pure videogame journalist. He called MGS2 out for having a bad story, and bad delivery of said bad story.

There is nothing bad-ass about a cyborg with heels. Someone designed that armor, looked at the feet, and said “this cyborg needs high-heels??”

They are basically a feudal government. But, on an individual level, modern governments operate in basically the same way. In a democracy you can vote and theoretically influence and shape the laws, but that only works on an aggregate level for the people, not for a particular person.

sounds like a government if you think about it ^^

You can be both right and an asshole, and I think BoS embodies both those things perfectly. I understand where you’re coming from, though!

Actually it speaks very good english..... now ill pass the earworm to you.

More proof that Kinja needs a downvote/target-for-ortillery-strike button. :|

Surprised at the Yes rating. The positives don’t seem to outweigh the negatives, imo. But I guess it has Star Wars in the name so....

Agreed.

I don’t know, it seems here he’s mostly just arguing “hey, bitches, I can fuck you up at a moments notice. Don’t fuck with me.”

This game is an insult to the offerings the last game in the series gave us. Wheres Galactic Conquest for starters? Battlefront 2 gave you an amazing single player game as well as the great online multiplayer and that was back on freaking PS2. Now you expect me to shell out $60 for less than half the offerings of a…

I love how they’re charging you 60 dollars for a gutted game with less content than the previous 2 entries, features removed or dumbed down into nothing, 12 maps which many are relegated to specific modes(have fun playing walker assault on like 2 maps) and THEN want to sell a 50 dollar season pass with some of said…

Thanks for this review, I had money for one triple a title this month and I picked fallout. Looks like I picked well.

Skip. No good reason to have half a game. Even though BF never had a set piece focused/action campaign, it gave you plenty of options. The maps were also large enough that they felt like campaign levels. They had some cutscenes and dialog...it worked. It was fun. You also had Galactic Conquest which has a lot of…

This game is such a massive disappointment. Its way too easy and there is barely any variety in the matches I’ve played. There are barely any maps and even then they all pretty much have the same vehicles and power ups. Guess Im sticking with Halo and Rainbow Six this year

“A nice, heartwarming change.”