drsensible3
DrSensible3
drsensible3

Here’s my problem with that. This is the first movie of a DC multiverse, where character actions and decisions will have long lasting impact for all films in a franchise. You’re also taking a character as icon as Superman and spin his character? You’re basically making a movie that says “Here is a DC universe... but

I don’t think that’s his point. Likewise, the Chitauri were the fault of nobody on the team, but an alien invasion (that was going to happen whether Loki did anything). I think the General’s point is that there was a lot of fire and brimstone that occurred on those days, and perhaps it could have been lessened in

Exactly. It’s in an entirely different system. If we assume they’re describing solar system and not the fact that it’s a separate planet (which you’d think the Falcon would be able to notice, as the Empire enters hyperspace and would have to come back when Boba Fett tells the Empire where they’re headed) it would take

Abrams is a really bad director. Please Please Please stop letting him touch major franchises.

I think that they will make general mentions of it, but really only because they have to. Don’t forget that there is going to be a Spider-man cameo in the movie, and with the addition of Black Panther they’re going to have to make a comment about how more masked vigilantes/people with powers are cropping up in

Well... I think that there are some union restrictions for bringing a named character in for a cameo appearance, and a definite minimum payment that has to be made that exceeds that or typical background extra. These have to be followed, else you get the awful union to force actors away from studios or actors get

It’s an odd comment that Falcon is following Cap because he “earned” his rank, when in reality his rank was given to him as a gimmick to sell War Bonds. Certainly since he’s gotten his rank he has earned it, but the phrasing is an odd one.

Oh!... I highly recommend it! It’s my favorite Star Trek, and I also started out on TNG. Yeah, the effects are bad, the acting seems a bit theatrical, and some of the philosophy is the “smash you over the head” kind, but I think it explores the human psyche much more thoroughly and the bond between the three main crew

Well... they do seem to make an exception for The Walking Dead (only). But they sure do make up for it with write-ups on movies from a decade ago and music videos from the 80s! So... really... aren’t we ahead in the long run? (We’re not.)

Unless you’re watching them out of order or TNG was the first series you saw, you would have seen a similar episode where a malfunction with the transporter broke Kirk into his good and evil sides, allowing both to exist on the ship in separate bodies at once.

Overall, however, I would say that everything is still

To be honest... I hate that “other” space show’s country theme song way more than Trek. You’re right that the start difference between the Enterprise theme and the rest of the series is jarring, but the song for Enterprise was far better than that of “Firefly”...

Let’s not go crazy here. Enterprise started out really rough, and much of what they did seemed to fly in the face of established canon. For example, Kirk and Spock know nothing about the Gorn, Picard knows nothing about the Borg, and where are the commentaries about the great Romulan/Federation war where they fought

Honestly, you can’t believe this comparison... right? You’re saying that a random military storyline doesn’t get played, and therefore people wouldn’t play the campaign of a Star Wars game??? That’s banana pants crazy. You cannot honestly believe that.

Here’s my problem with that:

1) They decided to call their game “Star Wars: Battlefront”. When you do that, you are using the title from the previous games to pull in fans, but it’s a double sided blade. You must include with your game the base elements that make this game worthy of the title. Personally, I don’t think

Hi! Um... maybe actually play the game before making a comment that is completely incorrect! There was a campaign in both games, as they would often either tell a story, allow for different units to go against each other than you could do in a multiplayer game (like Empire vs. Clones), and would have unique

I owe you an apology, because I likely misspoke using the term “importance”. I believe you did get the gist of where I was going with this, as you seemed to flow right into my meaning. His lack of appearance absolutely worked for that movie (it’s my personal favorite for Batman movies), I just have trouble comparing

I was much younger at the time, but I remember just being confused about Ledger being the Joker. I didn’t think he was right for the character. Now everybody loves his character, but it was not the Joker. I enjoyed him too! But the Joker? Not even close. Wipe the clown make-up off the guy, blank out anytime someone

First, let me be clear that I was speaking directly to you, and thinking of nobody else. The “Adolf/Jewish” comment was used to illustrate that phrasing and tone could allow someone to determine the motivation of a person despite limited interaction, not an indication of your actual beliefs.

My issue with you, and the

I disagree with you, and shall attempt to explain why. There is a difference between championing what is right and (what Social Justice Warrior has come to mean) taking a stance against something that they perceive as incorrect. Look at the words MetaKnight2k used: implicit racism, implicit sexism, the acknowledgement

Given your tone and content of your post, I’m more than comfortable to make that determination. I’m sure if I had posted something to the effect of “Adolf shold have kelled all dem joos!” you would also be able to make similar judgement about myself. Sometimes short comments speak volumes, and yours is one of