drsensible3
DrSensible3
drsensible3

I would delight in hearing someone review the prototype if anyone does ever get the game working. It would be neat to see what they did to actually improve a series that has been missing a true sequel for 10 years.

Well... the author of the article seems to indicate that there is at least half of the league that is opposed to keeping Ra’s around. Can Batman not leverage them to stop the other half from carrying out his will? If not, it seems like the choice is very easy: give the juice to Ra’s to prevent the deaths of Gotham’s

Impressive, but boy does that look tedious and not at all like a fun time...

I want to stress something to start off, because it is very important that you understand where I’m coming from in order to perceive my argument: Justice and Law are not the same thing, and the Law rarely (if ever) meets out Justice.

Now, you said that the following quote: “It’s this non acceptance of death that I

To answer your question about “Are broken rules even rules anymore?” the question can be answered “undoubtably yes”. Not only in our world, but in the DC world as well.

Now, we put Batman and Superman in a glowing heroic light, but let’s not pretend that they always agree with the others methods or even refrain from

One could argue that he cares more about human life since his actions as Batman would save many people from dying at the hands of these criminals once they inevitably escape again. Justice, too, is subjective. The law is not. Killing Ra’s or the Joker could very easily be seen as Justice, despite being against the law

To be fair, I think that is a little biased as well. First, let me agree with you that it is not to Batman to decide whether these people live or die. He’s doing his thing just fine. And I think it is better that Batman doesn’t kill, as a symbol for others.

But to not kill because he would not be able to stop? Bruce

You seem to be implying that Batman is personally deciding the fates of these criminals. He captures them, and then brings them to law enforcement to allow the law to decide what their sentence should be. The people get to vote public officials into office who then make adjustments to the current system to match the

Clarification question, as I have not played this DLC, or even Arkham Knight: What events make it so that is framed as Batman “killing” Ra’s? Sure, he could give the Lazarus concoction to Ra’s so he keeps on living... but he could also give it to a random occupant of a nursing home and extend their lives considerably.

U

“Hey Ad Team! We want to convey that these upcoming films will be gritty! What have you got for me?”

“Um... well... grit?”

“What do you mean?”

“We... we just put grit everywhere. Just fill the picture with dirt. Just throw subtlety and cleverness out the window and just shower everything with dirt particles...”

“Brilliant!

Love this article and hate the Elmo character, but the character was indirectly responsible for one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen.

For Christmas one year I got my niece a laughing, moving Elmo chair. She had been walking for only a short period at this point, and I doubt how much Sesame Street she actually had

Oh, yeah, I get the irony. But he gave his opinion and I’m sure he wouldn’t get into Lee’s face if he were told that his Daredevil is “not the real one” by Lee...

I’m just saying that the man’s opinion should be valued and listened to, but that we have no need to bend to that old weirdo’s will. That’s all!

Why? Why must you ask questions that practically guarantee that you’re going to hate me upon my response? Well... it was fun while it lasted.

The problem with a lot of the new iterations of Star Trek wasn’t that they weren’t “good ol’ Star Trek”, but that they were very badly written. Most of the characters were stiff

Everything I have to say is complete supposition, but I’m going to voice my concerns because I’m enjoying our conversation!

Well, here’s where I see us going on the path of exponential technological development. Currently, our population growth is unsustainable. Resources will become more and more sparse as we need

Well... the problem is that because of all our development it doesn’t take much to end a few million people in a single strike now. If everyone were willing to play with each other nicely, we could end it now, but too many people want to eliminate one another to make that a practicality. Also, military research and

Vader has to be in it... but I think Tarkin does not. He’s busy overseeing construction for a nearly completed battlestation, and likely cannot be galavanting about the galaxy with Vader, who is the Emperors personal hound and has abilities beyond than of normal men. Considering that Vader was in persuit and captured

Well, I don’t think that’s necessarily fair. When you create and work on something for as long as he did, and especially if it is 1 out of 1000 that actually becomes very popular, to see someone tinker with your formula has got to be absolutely heart wrenching. Let’s not judge a man for caring about a thing he poured

I’m going to disagree with you here a bit, but please know that I get where you’re coming from.

First off, I would say that ownership doesn’t mean that you automatically are faultless. I think we’ve seen enough evidence in the past of this, but Star Wars is the most universally understood example. You also, with

Well... to be perfectly fair, I believe that in the situation of Star Trek, if we had the tech and there were aliens out there... we probably wouldn’t be far off from where they are now.

See, Star Trek has made it easy for themselves in a few ways, and in others their perfect federation would almost be natural. Food

Stencil art is a metaphor. Because they’re always going to go back to the same thing, they could use a stencil since there won’t be any changes that need to be considered in the future. I was being cheeky, and you have my apologies for it!

From what I understand, they are creating a multiverse again, but it is doubtful