drsensible3
DrSensible3
drsensible3

HOLY COW I’VE COMPLETELY FORGOTTEN ABOUT THAT!!! Prior to the Phantom Pain coming out I had put in my Xbox 360 copy of the Metal Gear Collection (which doesn’t include 1 or 4, the jerks!) and only got through MGS2 and about half of Peacewalker before switching to TPP. I’m so sorry for getting that mixed up! That was

I was a kid when I saw TMP for the first time, not all that long after the first time I watched the Original Trilogy. I thought it sucked then, and continue to think the prequels stuck. The Original Trilogy is neither cheesy nor goofy. From a completely sterile perspective on what makes movies good, you can see that

Completely agree about the zombie beat ‘em up (I assume we’re talking about the walk down the river when all the dead soldiers come after you?). One of the interesting things I noticed and was able to confirm later on is that the soldier density and animations were directly related to how many you killed and in what

Sorry, I wasn’t spoiling anything, I meant that I want to play as Solid Snake, and not Big Boss. I like Big Boss well enough, but the hero we’d been following for a long time was Solid Snake. Then we get Raiden, then MGS III doesn’t give us Solid Snake, then we get old Snake without any of the MGS1 feel to it and have

You’re absolutely correct and I did not see that! Thank you for educating me!!!

I read your first sentence and thought to myself “Why would you possibly want it to die if it was one of your favorite francises?!?!?”... then I thought about NuTrek and slapped myself in the face.

You have my apologies for my brief moment of stupidity. I would like a companion piece to MGSV instead of this “MGS2”

Adblock is as popular as it is mostly due to the terrible implementation of Ads in videos. Here are the problems with Ads in Youtube videos that, if corrected, I think would fix a lot of the issues:

- Youtube keeps playing the same Ads over and over again. I get it, a time specific movie/game/etc is being released and

For battles, you’ll find them if you begin to harass enemy ships, or patrols will come after you if you begin to effect a planet’s biology too much (build/kill too much). You won’t have any trouble finding trouble.

My understanding from the developer is that you’re not really supposed to meet up with friends. You could start off on opposite sides of the galaxy and spend your entire time with the game trying to reach a system to meet up. That excites me, and is one of the more interesting aspects of the game.

The source of the Wookiepedia article is a book titled “Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith Incredible Cross-Sections” that doesn’t include all information in it because all developments were not completed for the movie at the time of writing.

Now playing

I completely agree with you. If people having matching abilities is 100% of what it takes to have a great relationship, Luke and Leia should have been busting out the itty bitty Force Babies (which brings to mind the below cartoon)...

The Nintendo Gamecube is one of the ugliest things in all of history, and Mario Kart 64 was the greatest Mario Kart. I believe you will find that it is you who are mistaken... about a great many things...

Not to destroy your optimism about Xbox’s new dashboard, but right now it is a cold and tantalizing mess. I love my Xbox, but the original dashboard was just... just terrible, so I signed up onto the Preview program to see what new interface they were going to come up with.

It is SO MUCH WORSE than the already bad

Didn’t see that one before, but it was beautifully drawn and paneled. Thanks for sharing it!

Appreciate the article correcting Mr. Butt but...

1) Obi-Wan is not an idiot. He’s manipulative, sure. All the great old advisers have been. Dumbledore, Gandalf, even Merlin. Why should Obi-Wan be any different?

2) Vader is not weak, even in Jedi. Subservient, sure. He’s got a master who is uber-powerful in the Force.

I disagree with you, mostly because I feel that most people are hypocrites like you claim. I want my old Superman back. I get that you want something new and that you’re enjoying this run (at least, that is what I’m taking away from your comment), but I very much preferred the previous iteration that we had.

Superman’s uncompromising nature is one of the things I love about him as a character. He feels that, morally, he is the most justified and sensible person on the planet. He doesn’t compromise, he doesn’t cut corners, he’s the all-around good boy. Some people don’t like that about the character, but I find that unique

C’mon... most of these are incredibly stupid. Game developers are lazy? Or that Players always know what is best for a game? Some of these are phrased so specifically that of course they’re not true. Are some game developers lazy? I’m sure they are, and I’m sure they fail. Players will often have great ideas about a

1) The OT used CG to enhance practical effects, not replace a story. Don’t be purposefully ignorant.

2) Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill provided fine acting performances. Not academy award winning, but to compare them to the empty dead-eyes blandness of the prequels is either you showing ignorance of acting performances

You stated that the only reason people judge the original trilogy as superior was due to nostalgia. You posited something without any verifiable evidence that was clearly biased and in error. Wrong fact, wrong opinion.