drsensible3
DrSensible3
drsensible3

We get some, but they’re always in one direction, from movies to tv (and all 2nd tier characters). I assume cost is the big reason we don’t get more of both. You can’t afford to put big name actors on their TV show, and TV stars will need to be paid more (and have a legitimate place) for a brief movie cameo. Contracts

Yes, but they’re likely going to speed it along to catch up. No small children means that the aging can be more forgiving. They’ll probably skip large sections of idle hands or start a season off when the survivors are at their lowest point.

There were portions of season 2 I really did enjoy. Shane was one of them. That guy was the one I kept screaming at my tv for the other characters to listen to. He was right about everything, and now that they’ve survived a bit longer they actually are doing the things he would.

Here are some of those points - In

Yep, we will. It’s not like I’m going to stop watching entirely, but her antics do cause enough frustration that I just have to build up a tolerance over a few weeks before I can dive in again. To me, it’s the Coulson show. He’s the one we loved from the movies, and he’s the reason I was eager to see this series in

Wow... you certainly have an interesting (but flawed) view of Republicans. Republicans are not against peace, respect, and knowledge at all. Nor do we (that’s right!) believe others are beneath us. I’m not disagreeing with you about whether they would be around in the Star Trek timeline, because one of the two big

You don’t think football will survive the next 20 years? The game that is currently America’s favorite sport? Even if it declines from the spot like Baseball did, it’s not going to be gone in 20 years. It certainly won’t be replaced by the soccer. Most of the people stateside that actually support the game indicate

But they did have some superpowered people. Season 1 they had people like the fire guy who were in the Index but had nothing to do with the Inhumans. I thought hunting down people with powers and the consequences was interesting. A cabal of superhumans older than time and hidden away was interesting for a time, but

When you call a game the same name of a beloved series, it’s not crazy to think that they will have some elements of the original series included. No galactic conquest, no space battles, no instant action solo against bots, 3 worlds (plus a fourth at launch!... that will look exactly like one of the three we already

I don’t care!!!

At this point, I only want one thing from this game: singleplayer full battles against bots. It was one of the staples of the original series and it is a requirement for this game. I don’t care about “Missions” mode or any of their other announcements. Just the ability to go Instant Action and play

I didn’t love her character, I mostly think she was the only one that was properly developed and interesting in that movie. I really did not like that movie, despite the great effects. Really no story whatsoever.

Eh... I wanted more superpowered people being involved, both allies and enemies, but the show was sold as “normal SHIELD people having to deal in a world of superhumans”. Admittedly, I don’t like Skye and wish she would be removed from the show, but the more interesting characters (May, Ward, Coulson, Fitz, Simmons)

He had a backpack when he left Earth. Isn’t it likely it included some stuff from school which could include information on art? Isn’t it also likely that it could have included some items for entertainment, like a Kevin Bacon movie? Or that it was his favorite movie and one he watched many times over? I haven’t seen

Why wouldn’t he? He had a whole backpack with him when he left after visiting his mother in a hospital. He probably had a collection of school books, papers, and entertainment in there. There is no reason to believe he wouldn’t treasure those items of his home to nearly the same level as he does the tapes his mother

Here’s the thing... this is the sequel. Some fans spoke up after Man of Steel, and while I don’t disagree that this will make a ton of money, you still have to try to honor your principles. That means making jokes/hating on the internet and not seeing the movie in theater. That’s what I did for Into Darkness, and

I am not a Halo fan. I think the controls are sloppy, the weapons are terrible, the flood an aggravation, and much of the storyline overrated.

That being said, I’ve played a great number of them and the only one I really like is Halo Wars. That game was vastly underrated, and was a rare RTS on the 360 (Command and

Only memorable character or... only character at all? The sum total of people in that game (to my recollection) were:

Leader guy who said two lines
Brother and Sister on the space station who had 4 lines
Lady whose lines were “I don’t even have time to explain why I don’t have time to explain!”
And Dinklebot.

Quest givers

I care still... and I know of a lot of people that still care. This “continuity fetish” was a huge new thing that hasn’t really been done in movies before. Sure, now everybody else is trying to get on board not getting that it’s the quality of the movies that are making us come back, but that doesn’t ignore the fact

He’s shown up a couple times in It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia... but that’s all I’ve seen him in...

One thing of note I think... In the original game you briefly were able to ride a motorcycle, but most of your adventuring took place via walking, Chocobo, or airship. In their movie, everybody was using Motorcycles (the airship showed up briefly as well as a helicopter, but people shown traveling (i.e. Cloud and

Good article. One thing I must say is that while the Fallout 3 visual emerging from the Vault was good, I much prefer the earlier Oblivion. When you emerge from the dank and disgusting prison to a pristine woodland (especially with the at the time fresh graphics of the Xbox 360)... one of my most memorable gaming